Very nice "dance floor" :) It could stand more sharpening if you want
to. You got them in a really nice pose, plus the awesome surroundings
more than make up for any flaws. I like this very much.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
> A question from Marnie about LV reminded
Works for me!
Cheers,
frank
Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
>A question from Marnie about LV reminded me that I had a photo taken at
>the
>Red Rock Park that was posted online.
>
>It was not perfect technically (for a variety of reasons, objective and
>subjective), - but it was still a fun setting.
>L
On Oct 24, 2009, at 15:10 , David J Brooks wrote:
Look at his eyes Frank. Subversive for sure.:-)
Love this shot
Dave
Anyone who blows on an instrument for a living ends up with eyes like
that, Dave!
:-)
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:44 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
This is the sort of s
Look at his eyes Frank. Subversive for sure.:-)
Love this shot
Dave
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:44 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> This is the sort of subversive activity the cops on Ossington Avenue
> had to save us from during the street party this summer (see the PESO
> "Keeping the Peace"):
>
>
>
> This is the sort of subversive activity the cops on Ossington
> Avenue had to save us from during the street party this
> summer (see the PESO "Keeping the Peace"):
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/swinging-it-brazil-
> style.html
>
> This fellow was terrific, playing Brazili
Very 1940-s or 50-s type of shot.
Dave
On Feb 14, 2008 8:51 AM, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been staring at this one for a while, and I'm still not sure if I
> like it. So I thought I'd let the collective make up my mind for me.
> ;)
> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/
Thanks for the links, Peter. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Swinging (with a Brownie Surprise)
> Film for Cla
Thanks for the links, Scott. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Swinging (with a Brownie Surprise)
> Christine
Bob W wrote:
> it builds on and extends a line of artistic descent from Fragonard and
> Watteau, through Renoir and Winslow Homer all the way to Gerry and the
> Pacemakers. Congratulations - you are living proof of Wittgenstein's
> theory of art as family resemblance.
Thanks. I think. While I mo
Film for Classics carries 127 film but it ain't cheap.
http://www.filmforclassics.com/html/printable_order_form.htm
The frugal photographer carries only color film for a bit less
http://www.frugalphotographer.com/cat127.htm
I think B&H photo has it as well, but I haven't looked there in ages.
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:34:00 -0500
Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Bran. Do you mean the lower right? The lower left is simply
> vignetting. The lower right is probably my finger or a camera strap
> or some schmutz on the lens. Who knows?
yes lower right. study of socio
Paul, he used a g**d*** holga. He's lucky there's an image at all.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cute moment, but a bit too soft for my taste. Motion blur would be okay, bu
> this appears to be front focused.
> Paul
> -- Original message --
> From: Scott Loveless <[
You should process the film that's in the camera. Might be some faded
images on there. It's worth a try.
Have fun.
paul
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:01 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> Scott: I was just reading an article in Photolife about toy
> cameras. Then
> you posted your really sweet photo Swing
Christine Aguila wrote:
> Scott: I was just reading an article in Photolife about toy cameras. Then
> you posted your really sweet photo Swinging. Then I read Peter's post about
> the Brownie Camera. Then I had a flash from the past & was pretty sure I
> had a Brownie. Then I started digging
On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:37 PM, Mat Maessen wrote:
> On 2/14/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The newer Holgas, produced in the last year or two, come with two
>> film
>> guides - 645 and 6x6. No more sharp edges! I should have lied
>> and told
>> you how I spent countless ho
Scott: I was just reading an article in Photolife about toy cameras. Then
you posted your really sweet photo Swinging. Then I read Peter's post about
the Brownie Camera. Then I had a flash from the past & was pretty sure I
had a Brownie. Then I started digging around in messy closets in the
On 2/14/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The newer Holgas, produced in the last year or two, come with two film
> guides - 645 and 6x6. No more sharp edges! I should have lied and told
> you how I spent countless hours filing and sanding and light proofing my
> little plastic to
On Feb 14, 2008, at 5:51 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> I've been staring at this one for a while, and I'm still not sure if I
> like it. So I thought I'd let the collective make up my mind for me.
> ;)
> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganAndMolly/
> photo#5154404518927952050
>
> Holga,
Bob W wrote:
> it builds on and extends a line of artistic descent from Fragonard and
> Watteau, through Renoir and Winslow Homer all the way to Gerry and the
> Pacemakers. Congratulations - you are living proof of Wittgenstein's
> theory of art as family resemblance.
Thanks. I think. While I mo
Mat Maessen wrote:
> On 2/14/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganAndMolly/photo#5154404518927952050
>>
>> Holga, some cheap Eastern Bloc film that won't lay flat, f8 @ 1/60 (give
>> or take).
>
> Someone took the film guide out of his
P. J. Alling wrote:
> I'd day use an old brownie instead, except the quality is so much better.
>
I have an Agfa Isoly Junior like this one here:
http://www.chromeagecamera.com/Isoly.htm It's rather funky in that it
takes 120 roll film, but produces a 4x4 square image. I believe the
infamous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Didn't notice it was a Holga pic on my previous response. That's
> what I get for not reading all the way to the end. I guess that makes
> it a good Holga pic. Soft is part of the package. Maybe I understand
> the aesthetic of Holga shooting:-). Paul
And Rick said this,
it builds on and extends a line of artistic descent from Fragonard and
Watteau, through Renoir and Winslow Homer all the way to Gerry and the
Pacemakers. Congratulations - you are living proof of Wittgenstein's
theory of art as family resemblance.
Bob
>
> I've been staring at this one for a whi
On 2/14/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganAndMolly/photo#5154404518927952050
>
> Holga, some cheap Eastern Bloc film that won't lay flat, f8 @ 1/60 (give
> or take).
Someone took the film guide out of his Holga to make it a 6x6. :-)
O
Because the Holga has a lens for a format somewhat smaller than it's
actual format. I think it would actually cover 4x4 quite nicely.
Walter Hamler wrote:
> Something different. I have never played with a Holga but several
> folks in the camera club are using them a lot.
> Why are the edges dark
I'd day use an old brownie instead, except the quality is so much better.
Scott Loveless wrote:
> Walter Hamler wrote:
>
>> Something different. I have never played with a Holga but several
>> folks in the camera club are using them a lot.
>>
>
> Thanks, Walt. Much appreciated. They're o
Didn't notice it was a Holga pic on my previous response. That's what I get
for not reading all the way to the end. I guess that makes it a good Holga pic.
Soft is part of the package. Maybe I understand the aesthetic of Holga
shooting:-).
Paul
-- Original message -
Cute moment, but a bit too soft for my taste. Motion blur would be okay, bu
this appears to be front focused.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've been staring at this one for a while, and I'm still not sure if I
> like it.
It has a rather Soviet-era air about it, for sure. I
have mixed feelings about it too. Without the Soviet
touches it would be an ordinary snap.
Rick
--- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been staring at this one for a while, and I'm
> still not sure if I
> like it. So I though
Bran Everseeking wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:51:03 -0500
> Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've been staring at this one for a while, and I'm still not sure if
>> I like it. So I thought I'd let the collective make up my mind for
>> me. ;)
>> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdlove
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:51:03 -0500
Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been staring at this one for a while, and I'm still not sure if
> I like it. So I thought I'd let the collective make up my mind for
> me. ;)
> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganAndMolly/photo#515440451
Walter Hamler wrote:
> Something different. I have never played with a Holga but several
> folks in the camera club are using them a lot.
Thanks, Walt. Much appreciated. They're only about $20. Give it a try.
> Why are the edges dark like you are shooting through a tube?
HAR! Holgas are junk
Something different. I have never played with a Holga but several
folks in the camera club are using them a lot.
Why are the edges dark like you are shooting through a tube?
Walt
On 2/14/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been staring at this one for a while, and I'm still not s
33 matches
Mail list logo
