Re: SFX & InfraRed/which camera to use

2001-06-10 Thread Joseph Tainter
The FA 20-35 is a fine, sharp lens, one of Pentax's best zooms. I use mine often, and find that my favorite pictures often come from it. It takes 58 mm. filters, but you should get the thin variety to avoid vignetting at 20 mm. Only drawback is that, if you leave a filter on, you can't attach the

Re: SFX & InfraRed

2001-06-07 Thread Artur Ledóchowski
- Original Message - From: "Maciej Marchlewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: SFX & InfraRed > Hi! > This is my first post to this group so I would like to great everybody here: > Hello! > I'm a student (MA this year) from Poland. Hello from

RE: SFX & InfraRed

2001-06-07 Thread Maciej Marchlewski
ping prints by myself? Thanks for your help. Maciej P.S. Thats a really nice list to be on. > -Original Message- from Bill D. Casselberry > Subject: Re: SFX & InfraRed > Don't let anyone > develop the film unless they are familiar with and equipped for >

Re: Re: SFX & InfraRed

2001-06-06 Thread William Johnson
Eric wrote, >This Eric in Utah and I have a silly question for the >pdml. The two manual >cameras that I own are the P3t and ZX-M and my >question is; which camera >would handle IR film better as to not get the blury >stuff or leaking? If a >K-1000 and the ME do just fine I would guess it's due >

Re: SFX & InfraRed

2001-06-06 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
Eric Platt wrote: > This Eric in Utah and I have a silly question for the pdml. The two manual > cameras that I own are the P3t and ZX-M and my question is; which camera > would handle IR film better as to not get the blury stuff or leaking? If a > K-1000 and the ME do just fine I would guess it

Re: Re: SFX & InfraRed

2001-06-06 Thread Eric Platt
- Original Message - From: "Keith Zimmerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:25 PM Subject: Re: Re: SFX & InfraRed This Eric in Utah and I have a silly question for the pdml. The two manual cameras that I own a

Re: Re: SFX & InfraRed

2001-06-06 Thread Keith Zimmerman
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 10:29:20 -0800 From: "Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SFX & InfraRed Aaron wrote: > You may want to try Ilford's SFX film. Kodak's HIE IR has no > anti-halation layer, which adds to the problem (but also prod

Re: SFX & InfraRed

2001-06-05 Thread Aaron Reynolds
"Bill D. Casselberry" wrote: >The > Konica "peaks" its sensitivity at ~750 nanometers whereas the > Kodak runs well out into the 900's. The SFX drops off somewhere > just past ordinary red wavelengths. I think that SFX tops out at around 720nm, but that's

Re: SFX & InfraRed

2001-06-05 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
Aaron wrote: > You may want to try Ilford's SFX film. Kodak's HIE IR has no > anti-halation layer, which adds to the problem (but also produces neat-o > characteristics in the images), where SFX does. I have several > customers who have used SFX in newer Canons with no problem. Of course, >