Re: Re[2]: AF 360 FGZ and P-TTL mechanizm

2004-12-12 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "James" Subject: Re: Re[2]: AF 360 FGZ and P-TTL mechanizm I completely don't want to pay tax any more. how do I get around that? :) Die. William Robb

Re: Re[2]: AF 360 FGZ and P-TTL mechanizm

2004-12-12 Thread James
>in wireless lighting at all and wouldn't like to pay more for something that >they completeley don't want :-) I completely don't want to pay tax any more. how do I get around that? :) James

Re: Re[2]: AF 360 FGZ and P-TTL mechanizm

2004-12-10 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" Subject: Re: Re[2]: AF 360 FGZ and P-TTL mechanizm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10.12.04 15:37: I know about this, but the quastion is why to use built-in flash to send all this commands and information? Why not to use radio for

Re: Re[2]: AF 360 FGZ and P-TTL mechanizm

2004-12-10 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10.12.04 15:37: > I know about this, but the quastion is why to use built-in flash to > send all this commands and information? Why not to use radio for this? Ask Pentax Japan :-) But I guess - costs, right now you don't have to have radio transmitter buil-in do you? Wh

Re[2]: AF 360 FGZ and P-TTL mechanizm

2004-12-10 Thread dao_
Hello Sylwester, Friday, December 10, 2004, 4:27:16 PM, you wrote: >> ... If such channels present then why camera gives the >> commands to the flash by the pulses of bilt-in flash??? Why just not >> to transfer the information by radio if it already used for some >> purposes (instead of bui