RE: Re[2]: How unpleasant.........

2002-04-06 Thread Emilio Puga
Mine had also the cheaper one. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] En nombre de Bruce Dayton Enviado el: sábado, 06 de abril de 2002 18:38 Para: Pål Audun Jensen Asunto: Re[2]: How unpleasant. Every one of my FA's bought in the late 90&#x

Re: Re[2]: How unpleasant.........

2002-04-06 Thread Bob Rapp
The only lenses that I have purchased that did not have a rear cap were those included with the camera. If the lens was pulled out of a camera kit, it is unlikely that it would have a rear cap. Since the original caps cost money, a cheaper subsitute would make more sense for the dealer. Right? Pet

RE: Re[2]: How unpleasant.........

2002-04-06 Thread Nicolas Colarusso, CGA
I recently purchased the FA 50 f1.4 and it also came with the cheap back cap -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bruce Dayton Sent: April 6, 2002 11:38 To: Pål Audun Jensen Subject: Re[2]: How unpleasant. Every one of my FA&#

Re[2]: How unpleasant.........

2002-04-06 Thread Bruce Dayton
Every one of my FA's bought in the late 90's or as recent as 2001 have all had the good rear cap. I have yet to see a new lens from Pentax that came with the cheap cap. Bruce Dayton Saturday, April 06, 2002, 2:27:47 AM, you wrote: PAJ> Alan wrote: >>Somehow Pentax replaced the good old re