Frantisek wrote:
PFS We compare our photos to those in National Geographic.
FV Which doesn't tell you ANYTHING about sharpness or lens qualities :)
and Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
As unexpected as it may seem, it was a touch of humour from Paul's
part. ;o)
Actutally, Franticek
I get the feeling that he only truly gushes when it is Minolta gear as
that seems to be what he uses these days. But I do generally agree
with your assessment.
Bruce Dayton
Monday, June 24, 2002, 6:10:29 AM, you wrote:
RBMB That was also a long time ago when Keppler was using Olympus gear.
I hate you guys :-)
I'll find the quote and post it (sometime) :-)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mishka
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: Lens Sharpness?
LMAO!
From: Bob
Hi,
Sure, that checks for how well the lens works for photographing
newspapers at 15 feet.
Unfortunately, it doesn't say much for how well the lens works
for what you photograph (unless you photograph newspapers).
some of my best friends are newspaper photographers g.
---
Bob
LMAO!
From: Bob Walkden
Subject: Re[2]: Lens Sharpness?
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:55:51 -0700
Unfortunately, it doesn't say much for how well the lens works
for what you photograph (unless you photograph newspapers).
some of my best friends are newspaper photographers g
5 matches
Mail list logo