- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 9, 2001 12:27 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Photo Expo Japan 2001 - MZ-S and FA31Ltd
> Somebody should inform Contax.
Please expand on that thought Paul. The way 35mm film comes out
of the box, ther
Somebody should inform Contax.
>However, the rep clearly told me that it is IMPOSSIBLE, for there is no
means to memorise to which frame was exposed on the film.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
I think I am tired of myself too, but I am going to ask anyway. Is the
eyepiece plastic? Or simply put, is the eyepiece coated (uncoated =
plastic)?
regards,
Alan Chan
---
As and some people before I can't recognize it (plastic or glass).
IMHO (or exactly - from memory) it's coated.
Den
-
This m
I think I am tired of myself too, but I am going to ask anyway. Is the
eyepiece plastic? Or simply put, is the eyepiece coated (uncoated =
plastic)?
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at htt
ED]>
Date: April 8, 2001 11:48 AM
Subject: Re[2]: Photo Expo Japan 2001 - MZ-S and FA31Ltd
>> Ironically, the MZ-S don't really need extra battery
>> juice as much as the Z-1p. It uses significantly less
>> power. I understand that the battery grip offer more
>> featu
Hi Paal,
> LX-like sealing may be difficult for all I know but
> sealing (by a different method) should be possible. I
> mean, both Nikon and Canon manage it and they are also
> electronic. I suspect that rep is somewhat out of his
> depths (lets hope so).
Maybe my questioning was not adequate.
At 1:09 AM +09004/9/01, Takehiko Ueda caused thus to appear:
>Hi Doug and all,
>
>I think so, too. However, the rep clearly told me that it
>is IMPOSSIBLE, for there is no means to memorise to which frame
>was exposed on the film.
Wow. It's gone from being a radical new feature (in a 35mm SLR) t
Hi Paal and all again:-)
> This is of no consequence in my opinion. You need to
> look trhough the viefinder to use AF in any meaningful
> way. More negative is the lack of the exposure bar on
> the external LCD panel. For manual use on a tripod
> external exposure bar display is great.
For this
Hi Paal and all,
> Yes, I've heard about that precise built quality. Sorry
> to hear about the lack of sealing. A Pentax rep told me
> it had such sealing. Same story was posted from someone
> in the US. Did they change plans?
I didn't ask him if there is some change made after the PMA.
He told m
Hi Doug and all,
> This must have been changed, because it is exactly
> opposite what I was told.
I think so, too. However, the rep clearly told me that it
is IMPOSSIBLE, for there is no means to memorise to which frame
was exposed on the film.
> Why would one need AF point indicators on the ex
10 matches
Mail list logo
