Bill, I have both a 55 and 90. I think that for a single lens, 55 is just a tad too wide. 75 or 90 would actually be better. The 55 is actually more like a 28mm. The 75 is closer to 35mm and the 90 is about 45-50 ish.
Bruce Dayton Wednesday, April 17, 2002, 3:28:10 PM, you wrote: WK> 55mm in 67 format would be around 35mm in 35mm format, right? Hmmm, it WK> is a nice price judging from what KEH lists . . . I can't afford it WK> right now though . . . unless I were to go for this instead of a normal WK> lens . . . what does the brotherhood think? WK> Illinois Bill WK> William Robb wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: J. C. O'Connell >> Subject: ebay steal >> >> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1346801122 >> > >> > BIN is great price! >> > I have this lens and its superb! >> >> Jeeze, JC, if I had one more glass of wine under my belt, I >> would have hit the BIn. >> Still might. >> I don't need this lens. >> I don't like this angle of view. >> HELP MEEEEEEE!!!!!! >> >> William Robb >> - >> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . WK> - WK> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, WK> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to WK> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
