> I hope I haven't misunderstood what
you're saying; but I've heard on
> some places (probably photo.net) that one can develop XP2 with
> conventional/traditional B&W developers, and have it come out looking
> more or less like regular negatives.
Someone in
- -
- Original Message -
From: "Chan Yong Wei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: Re[3]: C 41 B&W film
I hope I haven't misunderstood what you're saying; but I've heard on
some places (probably photo.net) that
- Original Message -
From: "Chan Yong Wei"
Subject: Re: Re[3]: C 41 B&W film
I hope I haven't misunderstood what you're saying; but I've heard on
some places (probably photo.net) that one can develop XP2 with
conventional/traditional B&W developers, and
-
> Mark Cassino Photography
> Kalamazoo, MI
> www.markcassino.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alin Flaider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 9:02 AM
> Subject: Re[3]: C 41 B&W film
>
> >
By the time I'd moved to XP2 Super and T400CN as my only film
emulsions, I was doing all digital scanning to digital print
process. Overexposure down in the ASA 200 range created
negatives that ran too dense for good scanning practice, a less
dense negative renders better results.
Of course, when
- -
- Original Message -
From: "Alin Flaider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 9:02 AM
Subject: Re[3]: C 41 B&W film
Highlights are compressed at 200 but that's a small price to pay for
clean shadows. Origina
Highlights are compressed at 200 but that's a small price to pay for
clean shadows. Originally I was shooting XP2 at 400 ASA as the
recommended optimum sensitivity. Darker shadows than 2 EVs then
comes out with blotchy, irregular grain. And it's grain all right
not just noise introduced
7 matches
Mail list logo
