- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Re[4]: A new DSLR standard emerging? (WAS: Re:
Nikon DX lenses: Is this what Pentax is up to?)
>
> what does granularity and definition have to do with quality?
if sharpness
> is your only measure of quality, why stop at medi
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Mastering one format or the other is pompous crap.
Larger negatives are about superior image quality (granularity,
definition, etc), and ease of getting quality results.
Nothing else.<
what does granularity and definition have to do with quality?
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Re[4]: A new DSLR standard emerging? (WAS: Re:
Nikon DX lenses: Is this what Pentax is up to?)
> my opinion is that until you master the small format, moving
to the larger
> format only tells me how deep your wallet is.
I di
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re[4]: A new DSLR standard emerging? (WAS: Re: Nikon DX
lenses: Is this what Pentax is up to?)
>
> how does changing format change image quality? is resolution
or sharpness
> your only criteria for quality? high resolution or su
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Bill,
You have a way with words. After having experienced 67 compared to
35mm, I can clearly vouch for the quality difference that you talk
about. My 35mm gear is almost never being used anymore.
Bruce<
how does changing format change image qu
Bill,
You have a way with words. After having experienced 67 compared to
35mm, I can clearly vouch for the quality difference that you talk
about. My 35mm gear is almost never being used anymore.
Bruce
Friday, December 13, 2002, 3:51:26 PM, you wrote:
>> > HUH? I know the main points of PR
6 matches
Mail list logo
