Re: Real Resolution goes to (b&w) film

2005-10-17 Thread Rob Studdert
On 14 Oct 2005 at 15:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > #1 > When reviewing my picture of the young model from last year > http://members.safe-t.net/dpconsult/ashley.jpg > what occurred to me was the detail in the face. > If this was shot in digital, the comparison would be interesting. > Genuine

Re: Real Resolution goes to (b&w) film

2005-10-14 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Oct 14, 2005, at 12:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... If this was shot in digital, the comparison would be interesting. Genuine fractals can make the edges sharp but can't add any real detail that's not already present. ... You can't add detail to a print from a film negative either. Go

Real Resolution goes to (b&w) film

2005-10-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#1 When reviewing my picture of the young model from last year http://members.safe-t.net/dpconsult/ashley.jpg what occurred to me was the detail in the face. This was a "split" print. First as a magenta exposure for about 20 seconds, followed by a yellow exposure to burn in the face detail for