RE: Regarding my Tri-X question__DOH!

2005-06-27 Thread Shel Belinkoff
I've received it three time Shel > [Original Message] > From: Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Date: 6/27/2005 5:12:16 PM > Subject: RE: Regarding my Tri-X question__DOH! > > WOW! That one took the long way around, > I sent this 36 hours ago!

RE: Regarding my Tri-X question__DOH!

2005-06-27 Thread Don Sanderson
WOW! That one took the long way around, I sent this 36 hours ago! Don > -Original Message- > From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 10:46 AM > To: PDML > Subject: Regarding my Tri-X question__DOH! > > > Had a brilliant idea

Regarding my Tri-X question__DOH!

2005-06-26 Thread Don Sanderson
Had a brilliant idea, bought a roll and read the data sheet! It clearly states: "KODAK PROFESSIONAL TRI-X 400 Film/ 400TX replaces Kodak TRI-X Pan Film, and requires a different development time." Dear Don; RTFM! ;-) Don

Regarding my Tri-X question__DOH!

2005-06-26 Thread Don Sanderson
Had a brilliant idea, bought a roll and read the data sheet! It clearly states: "KODAK PROFESSIONAL TRI-X 400 Film/ 400TX replaces Kodak TRI-X Pan Film, and requires a different development time." Dear Don; RTFM! ;-) Don