Re: Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-05-01 Thread Joseph McAllister
On Apr 29, 2010, at 14:27 , David J Brooks wrote: I have those progression zoom glasses, which are basically one big bi focal, but its the floaties that really give me a hard time. I have to blink and or move my eyes almost constantly to keep them from the centre of my eyes. Hear hear. PITA

Re: Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-04-30 Thread David Mann
I must have missed the quoted post. I often use my macro lens for non-macro work and I find the AF to be very useful. It has a distance limiter which helps to limit any hunting. Saves me from having to buy a non-macro 100mm :) Cheers, Dave On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:58 AM, Jerry in Arizona

Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-04-29 Thread Jerry in Arizona
I am certainly glad that you are physically sound enough to use a manual focus macro (or any MF lens at all).  There are those of us where being visually or physically disabled have severe problems with MF lenses.  I suppose it might be helpful if you looked beyond beyond yourself before

Re: Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-04-29 Thread CheekyGeek
My apologies to any who were offended my my choice of words. For the record, I was calling no person ridiculous. I can certainly empathize with anyone who has special needs. However, most people are not in that category, and yet feel that they MUST have autofocus. It is like those without the need

Re: Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-04-29 Thread Bob Sullivan
Darren, You have to be careful. Just because your vision works perfectly, it's no reason to trash Autofocus. I've needed glasses for nearsightedness (+8 diopters) and an astigmatism, plus floaters (no help from the glasses), and now bifocals for reading. Making pictures in sharp focus has always

Re: Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-04-29 Thread David J Brooks
I have those progression zoom glasses, which are basically one big bi focal, but its the floaties that really give me a hard time. I have to blink and or move my eyes almost constantly to keep them from the centre of my eyes. Real PITA Dave On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Bob Sullivan

Re: Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-04-29 Thread Jerry in Arizona
To those of us who need/appreciate the technology even AF itself is far from ridiculous. My apologies to any who were offended my my choice of words. For the record, I was calling no person ridiculous. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

RE: Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-04-29 Thread J.C. O'Connell
One of the things I like about manual focus is the shutter lag is way shorter than AF. -- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net) Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions : http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: Ridiculous AF Macro

2010-04-29 Thread Rob Studdert
On 30/04/2010, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote: One of the things I like about manual focus is the shutter lag is way shorter than AF. It just depends how you use AF, if you use the AF button on the rear as a pre-focus with an AF then you're effectively in the same boat as using a manual