Back beating the same old horse... one of the reasons I'm hesitant to do adjustments is I often can't clearly remember the scene so I don't know if my adjustment becomes a 'correction' as opposed to an 'enhancement'.
For instance, I have some storm/rainbow shots that I recently took with the *istD. They look pretty washed out, not as I remember seeing them. When I do an auto-levels on them in Photoshop, man it makes a big difference and is more what I remember. But the difference is so huge and the results so much better that I feel guilty accepting the change... Any coments on this?
Thanks,
Tom
Tom C.
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PAW 1 - Hummingbird Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 10:12:15 +1000
On 27 May 2004 at 10:47, Tom C wrote:
> My first PAW is at this address...
>
> http://eseephoto.com/album.php?albumid=42ab2b214219fe005b2d&1085674794
>
> Let me know if you can access it... I don't know if it's password protected or
> not. Thanks.
>
> *istD w/smc FA 28-200 @ 200
> 1/350 sec
> f/6.7
> JPEG best
> Saved as .psd and unsharp masked in Photoshop before saving again as a .jpg
Very nicely executed, the only improvement it may have benefited from would have been a little light reflected on the birds underside, have you tried lightening it up a little in PS?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
