Re: Rusian lenses

i used to have one. here're my observations: -- it's BIG and HEAVY. iirc, the front element is ~80mm. -- it's all metal. -- the mechanical quality is so-so. zenitar fisheye is better -- the optical quality is OK. zenitar is better -- on ME-S, the mirror does not clear the rear filter. however, u

Re: Rusian lenses

> There's a 20 mm F2.5 that looks tempting for use in a > K10D-on-a-budget system: > > http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/mir_47_k_lens.htm > > Anyone have experience with that one? Alternatives? > I don't have that one, but I tend to use my Zenitar 16mm/2.8 when I need a wide-angle faster

Re: Rusian lenses

Sandy Harris escribió: > There's a 20 mm F2.5 that looks tempting for use in a > K10D-on-a-budget system: > > http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/mir_47_k_lens.htm > > Anyone have experience with that one? Alternatives? > I had one of those, but used it only on film cameras. It is a well made,

Re: Rusian lenses

There's a 20 mm F2.5 that looks tempting for use in a K10D-on-a-budget system: http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/mir_47_k_lens.htm Anyone have experience with that one? Alternatives? - Make sure it will fit under the overhanging rtf. As I recall, there was some uncertainty about that when

Rusian lenses

There's a 20 mm F2.5 that looks tempting for use in a K10D-on-a-budget system: http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/mir_47_k_lens.htm Anyone have experience with that one? Alternatives? -- Sandy Harris Quanzhou, Fujian, China -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailma