From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/20 Mon AM 12:55:20 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: SMC DA 12-24/4 - request for RAW files
On Feb 19, 2006, at 4:26 PM, keith_w wrote:
Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisa?(a):
Why does
On 20/2/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisa?(a):
Why does that not surprise me?
(Just kidding, G. ol' pal...
I found it impossible to pass up a good straight line!)
If I knew what it meant, would I be offended? ;-)
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/20 Mon AM 09:55:12 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: SMC DA 12-24/4 - request for RAW files
On 20/2/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisa?(a):
Why
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisa?(a):
Why does that not surprise me?
(Just kidding, G. ol' pal...
I found it impossible to pass up a good straight line!)
If I knew what it meant, would I be offended? ;-)
Godfrey
Cotty's always napisa'ed, as you can tell by his podpis.
Boris Liberman wrote on 20.02.06 11:51:
Now all my English blunders have been avenged...
Gentlemen, just to make sure you realise - pisat' in Russian (and
probably Polish) has two meanings: to write and to urinate.
No, in Polish it is odlac' sie' ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Boris Liberman wrote:
Gentlemen, just to make sure you realise - pisat' in Russian
(and probably Polish) has two meanings: to write and to urinate.
Well, it is cold there - writing in the snow?
Malcolm
Malcolm Smith wrote on 20.02.06 13:08:
Well, it is cold there - writing in the snow?
I believe there are places in Russia where you wouldn't be able to do it -
you urine would froze in the air not reaching ground or rather snow :-) I
think Boris can only confirm that ;-)
--
Balance is the
Boris Liberman napisał(a):
Gentlemen, just to make sure you realise - pisat' in Russian (and
probably Polish) has two meanings: to write and to urinate.
In Polish - not. In this case I'd change this... probably.
Jerry
Hello,
I am currently planning to ruin my funds and go superwide with my DS.
The choice is very limited, actually two lenses, SMC-DA 12-24/4 and
Sigma 10-20/4-5.6 are available on the market (I don't want DA 10-17
Fisheye, at least I don't want it now :). The big advantages of Pentax
are SMC
I don't buy Sigma lenses due to the problems I've had with Sigma in
the past. The DA12-24 would be my choice of those two, but I
personally prefer the DA14/2.8.
Here's a page with DA14 examples:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/14mm-examples/
The JPEGs are full resolution and processed
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisał(a):
I don't buy Sigma lenses due to the problems I've had with Sigma in the
past. The DA12-24 would be my choice of those two, but I personally
prefer the DA14/2.8.
Here's a page with DA14 examples:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/14mm-examples/
Thanks - I've
Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisał(a):
Why does that not surprise me?
(Just kidding, G. ol' pal...
I found it impossible to pass up a good straight line!)
[...]
keith
On Feb 19, 2006, at 4:26 PM, keith_w wrote:
Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisał(a):
Why does that not surprise me?
(Just kidding, G. ol' pal...
I found it impossible to pass up a good straight line!)
If I knew what it meant, would I be offended? ;-)
Godfrey
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4003362size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3971192size=lg
On Feb 19, 2006, at 7:19 PM, Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisał(a):
I don't buy Sigma lenses due to the problems I've had with Sigma in
the past. The DA12-24
Hit the trigger too fast on that last one. I tried sending you some RAW
files today, but my comcast mail program wouldn't take the *istD RAWs,
which are 12 meg. The software said they were 17 meg. I'll try again
with my other mail program. In the meantime, I have some jpegs from
this lens on
If I knew what it meant, would I be amused:-)
Paul
On Feb 19, 2006, at 7:55 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 19, 2006, at 4:26 PM, keith_w wrote:
Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisał(a):
Why does that not surprise me?
(Just kidding, G. ol' pal...
I found it impossible to
Paul Stenquist napisał(a):
Hit the trigger too fast on that last one. I tried sending you some RAW
files today, but my comcast mail program wouldn't take the *istD RAWs,
which are 12 meg. The software said they were 17 meg. I'll try again
with my other mail program. In the meantime, I have
You're right of course. I have the DNG converter and sometimes use it
for files I'm archiving. Should have thought of that. Will do.
Paul
On Feb 19, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Paul Stenquist napisał(a):
Hit the trigger too fast on that last one. I tried sending you some
RAW
18 matches
Mail list logo
