Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-16 Thread Thibouille
Mmm my any approaching experience has been trying to focus my Tamron 500/8 on my K10D (with tripod of course). I was inside and tried to shoot the moon through the window. Sure enough: * Quite difficult to focus without split screen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/8) * Exposure was waayy off on the K10D, had

RE: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-16 Thread J. C. O'Connell
A 1000mm F8 lens is easier to focus than a 500mm F8 lens if lens quality is same.. jco -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thibouille Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:12 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000 Mmm my

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-16 Thread Peter Fairweather
Can't the focus just be set to infinity? Peter Mmm my any approaching experience has been trying to focus my Tamron 500/8 on my K10D (with tripod of course). I was inside and tried to shoot the moon through the window. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-16 Thread Walter Hamler
Probably not because most long lenses actually move slightly past the infinity mark to allow for temperture variations. The problem then is to find infinity :-) In practice, it actually make focusing at infinity somewhat easier as ther is a soft-sharp-soft transition, rather than a soft-?

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-16 Thread Thibouille
No because it seems my very lens likes to focus past infinity (quite a bit by the way). I thought about that but obviously it is of not help in my case. Not sure I have money to fix it, for now. 2007/5/16, Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can't the focus just be set to infinity? Peter

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-16 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Thibouille Subject: Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000 No because it seems my very lens likes to focus past infinity Not sure I have money to fix it, for now. It's not broken. Don't try to fix it. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML

SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread Bob Blakely
I just purchased this lens so that I can seriously compress distance and for beach shots of ships and surfers taken off the piers here in Southern California. This beastie weighs about 11.6 pounds, so it'll go on the 475B tripod and 229 head. I'll be putting it on a CG-5 equatorial mount

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread P. J. Alling
It' huge dude. (You didn't say what kind of comments...) Bob Blakely wrote: I just purchased this lens so that I can seriously compress distance and for beach shots of ships and surfers taken off the piers here in Southern California. This beastie weighs about 11.6 pounds, so it'll go on

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:06:36PM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote.. I just purchased this lens so that I can seriously compress distance and for beach shots of ships and surfers taken off the piers here in Southern California. This beastie weighs about 11.6 pounds, so it'll go on the 475B tripod

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread frank theriault
On 5/15/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It' huge dude. (You didn't say what kind of comments...) Listmeister brought one to GFM several years ago. Someone somewhere has a photo of Jostein and me playing with it. Then we couldn't get it off the body, and Doug had to come help us...

SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread Walter Hamler
There is a smallish camera/rare coin shop here in Orlando that has a 500mm f/5 Takumar mounted to a black Spotmatic. It sits on a largish tripod next to the front window. Folks look through it at stuff across the street. I asked the owner one time if it was for sale. He scratched his head and

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread Mark Roberts
Bob Blakely wrote: I just purchased this lens so that I can seriously compress distance and for beach shots of ships and surfers taken off the piers here in Southern California. This beastie weighs about 11.6 pounds, so it'll go on the 475B tripod and 229 head. I'll be putting it on a CG-5

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread Bob Blakely
Well, then, I'd love to here from listmeister Brewer concerning his thoughts and observations re this giant piece of optics. Regards, Bob... - Original Message - From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bob Blakely wrote: I just purchased this lens so that I can seriously compress

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread Joseph Tainter
The design dates back to M42 days. My first SLR was a Honeywell Pentax H2, bought used in 1966. I also picked up a booklet on the Pentax system, and just dreamed of having this lens. I still think from time to time of getting one, but they are for sale rarely. Are you shooting it on a DSLR?

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread Bob Blakely
Just bought it. I'll let you know how it focuses (at f/8) when I get some time with it. I'll be using a K10D, so if I have any real problems focusing, I can switch the preview to the screen and zoom way in 'till I can 'bout see every pixel. Regards, Bob... - Original Message - From:

RE: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread J. C. O'Connell
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000 Just bought it. I'll let you know how it focuses (at f/8) when I get some time with it. I'll be using a K10D, so if I have any real problems focusing, I can switch the preview to the screen and zoom way in 'till I can 'bout see every

Re: SMC PENTAX 1:8/1000

2007-05-15 Thread Doug Brewer
On May 15, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: I believe listmeister Brewer has one of those. I had one in M42 version that I borrowed from Don for a few years. It was a great lens to shoot with, but lawd, you have to want to. Bob, when I spoke at GFM, I showed some landscape stuff I shot