RE: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-07-02 Thread Don Sanderson
I have a 35-105/3.5 Jens, superb lens. Don > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Jens Bladt > Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 3:52 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments? > > &g

RE: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-07-02 Thread Jens Bladt
PDML Emne: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments? Not much to be found on this one. Any yays or nays? TIA Don -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Dat

RE: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-07-01 Thread Don Sanderson
2006 5:54 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments? > > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Don Sanderson wrote: > > > Not much to be found on this one. > > Any yays or nays? > > Good focal range for my style of shooting (on film, mind

Re: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-07-01 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Don Sanderson wrote: > Not much to be found on this one. > Any yays or nays? Good focal range for my style of shooting (on film, mind you). Silly "close" focussing distance :-( That's the killer with F series lenses. Otherwise (240KB): http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/~kavousan/ow

Re: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-07-01 Thread cbwaters
y too long... CW - Original Message - From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PDML" Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 6:11 PM Subject: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments? > Not much to be found on this one. > Any yays or nays? > > TIA > Don >

RE: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-06-30 Thread Bob W
Sorry - not reading carefully enough. Mine was the A. -- Cheers, Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Bob W > Sent: 01 July 2006 00:39 > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' > Subject: RE: SMCP-F 35-135/

RE: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-06-30 Thread Bob W
worst Pentax lens I ever had. -- Cheers, Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Don Sanderson > Sent: 30 June 2006 23:11 > To: PDML > Subject: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments? > > Not much to be found on this

Re: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-06-30 Thread P. J. Alling
I think it's optically identical to the A version. I've never see either however. Don Sanderson wrote: >Not much to be found on this one. >Any yays or nays? > >TIA >Don > > > -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis

RE: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-06-30 Thread Don Sanderson
Thanks Charles, think I'll pass. ;-) Don > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Charles Robinson > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 6:24 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments? >

Re: SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-06-30 Thread Charles Robinson
On Jun 30, 2006, at 17:11, Don Sanderson wrote: > Not much to be found on this one. > Any yays or nays? > If I remember correctly from a test session at a local store a couple years ago: 1. REALLY long/large at full zoom 2. So-so image quality 3. Close-focus distance is something like 6

SMCP-F 35-135/3.5-4.5 comments?

2006-06-30 Thread Don Sanderson
Not much to be found on this one. Any yays or nays? TIA Don -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net