SV: *ist D was not production type :-(

Probably a MZ-S with and Limited's! Jens -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 6. juli 2003 13:50 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: *ist D was not production type :-( What about the report someone posted a few years back that the new Pentax CEO said

SV: *ist D was not production type :-(

Hi OK metal shells may be better. But I have a 11 years old Z1, (plastic shell) - still working like the day i got it in 1992 - through thousinds of rolls. What more would you expect from a diggie? You may have to buy a new one every 2-4 years anyway, because technology evolves so (too) fast. On th

SV: *ist D was not production type :-(

I the rumor says 1200 or 1600$ for the *ist D, I guess it may not be a magnesium body. Anyway it's difficult to tell the difference - at work we have a Nikon Coolpix something - it's supposed to be magnesium - but the feel is plasic. Jens