Why does the SMC-A 100/2.8 sell for significantly more than the SMC-A
135/2.8? Does the former have better optics than the latter or is it
just that the former is more convenient for portrait work?
--
David Barts
Portland, OR
Many more 135 lenses were sold than 100mm lenses. Supply and demand. BTW
the 100mm has a reputation for much better optics than the 135.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does the SMC-A 100/2.8 sell for significantly more than the SMC-A
135/2.8? Does the former have better optics than the latte
e-
> From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Short telephoto prices
>
>
> I believe that the 100 is somewhat more scarce than the 135.
>
> At 02:51 PM 3/7/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> >Why
3 matches
Mail list logo