On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:54:52 +0200, Frantisek wrote:
> I would suggest a Domke or Tenbo canvas bags.
I ___loooe___ my Domke F-2. It's big enough that I can
pack so much in there I don't want to carry it. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Hi Dave,
I would suggest a Domke or Tenbo canvas bags. Look like normal bag,
not camera bag, and some of the smaller models would be just for that.
And as I can attest, even it doesn't look weatherproof, my Domkes
survived day-long downpours at a sporting events without the cameras
inside getting
På 28. mar. 2005 kl. 11.48 skrev Cotty:
On 28/3/05, DagT, discombobulated, unleashed:
enablement decease
Excellent.
Hey, you are right .-)
DagT
On 28/3/05, DagT, discombobulated, unleashed:
>enablement decease
Excellent.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
På 28. mar. 2005 kl. 03.35 skrev Juan Buhler:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:59:25 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes ... Juan mentioned that he lost a K85/1.8 that fell from his
jacket
pocket.
Yep--for the record, it was a zipped pocket. I must have forgotten to
zip it...
I still carr
Quoting Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> >>I don't like to change lenses either, so when I'm shooting I prefer to
> >>have a small bag or belt system just for film and bits & pieces.
>
> > Thought that's what pockets were for.
>
> Yes and no. It's easy for things to fall out of pockets. I w
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:59:25 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes ... Juan mentioned that he lost a K85/1.8 that fell from his jacket
> pocket.
Yep--for the record, it was a zipped pocket. I must have forgotten to zip it...
I still carry an extra lens in a pocket sometimes. It's
Bob W mused:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sunday, March 27, 2005, 11:08:56 PM, Rick wrote:
>
> > I knew a photographer several years ago who always
> > used diaper bags for his gear. They are padded,
> > somewhat waterproof, anonymous, and cheap. One day he
> > accidentally left his bag (containing a N F4S
Bob W wrote:
Somebody once left
a bag outside the main gate of an RAF station where my father was posted.
That was back when the Royal Mail had the contract for transporting
military personnel, I presume?
S
Hi,
Sunday, March 27, 2005, 11:08:56 PM, Rick wrote:
> I knew a photographer several years ago who always
> used diaper bags for his gear. They are padded,
> somewhat waterproof, anonymous, and cheap. One day he
> accidentally left his bag (containing a N F4S and
> a few lenses) unattended
Dave, I was at B&H today and I looked at toploaders for you. Most of the
toploaders that have a belt loop looked to me like they'd be awkward to wear
(just my opinion) but you might find that the Lowepro Off Trail 1 or Off
Trail 2 work out for you. These have their own waist belts and detachable
Glad to know you're getting good use from it, and that the prototype has
held up over time. I made a few for my Pentax lenses, so now two or three
lenses (depending on focal length and whether or not a lens hood is
attached) will fit in one compartment of the Domke F-803.
Shel
> [Original Mess
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Because i don't like to change lenses once i'm, at a show,i plan
> on taking the istD and
> either the
> A28 or 28-105 for taking presentation shots. I thought a bag that
> could clip on a belt
> would do the
>
On 27 Mar 2005 at 19:33, Bob W wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sunday, March 27, 2005, 6:59:25 PM, Shel wrote:
>
> > Yes ... Juan mentioned that he lost a K85/1.8 that fell from his jacket
> > pocket.
>
> I wouldn't dream of putting something like a lens in a pocket. Even a
> lens as small as my Leitz 35/1.4.
; look different.
> > Good point though, a bit of black magic marker
> would fix that.
> > I'd still know what it was even without the name,
> wouldn't you?
> >
> > Don
> >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: Shel Belinkoff
At 09:59 AM 27/03/2005 , Shel wrote:
>
>Yes ... Juan mentioned that he lost a K85/1.8 that fell from his jacket
>pocket.
The point was a small bag when only using one lens. I've never put lenses
in my pockets. Batteries, lens caps, memory cards, filters, etc. Film in
the past.
Most of my jacket
Well, some pockets have proper secure closures on them, plus being deep enough
that something is not likely to fall out accidently anyhow. OTOH handwarmer
pockets are useless for carrying anything you don't want to lose. A little
common sense does help.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idi
was even without the name, wouldn't you?
>
> Don
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 11:28 AM
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: RE: Single camera bags
> >
&
Hi,
Sunday, March 27, 2005, 6:59:25 PM, Shel wrote:
> Yes ... Juan mentioned that he lost a K85/1.8 that fell from his jacket
> pocket.
I wouldn't dream of putting something like a lens in a pocket. Even a
lens as small as my Leitz 35/1.4.
I have some small lens pouches with shoulder straps if
Yes ... Juan mentioned that he lost a K85/1.8 that fell from his jacket
pocket.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bob W
> > Thought that's what pockets were for.
>
> Yes and no. It's easy for things to fall out of pockets. I wouldn't
> want to lose rolls of film, especially after I've gone to
Hi,
>>I don't like to change lenses either, so when I'm shooting I prefer to
>>have a small bag or belt system just for film and bits & pieces.
> Thought that's what pockets were for.
Yes and no. It's easy for things to fall out of pockets. I wouldn't
want to lose rolls of film, especially after
> Because i don't like to change lenses once i'm, at a
> show,i plan on taking the istD and
> either the
> A28 or 28-105 for taking presentation shots. I thought a
> bag that could clip on a belt
> would do the
> trick.
Hi Dave,
I use the Lowepro Nova 1 AW camera bag to carry my MZ-6 and the 28-1
I'd know, as would you and probably most photogs, and even quite a few
thieves. But, sans the emblazoned logo (and this goes for any logo on any
gear such as bags, camera straps, jackets, vests, and similar items) the
bag wouldn't be "announcing" itself in so loud a manner. Anyway, I'm sure
one c
for someone who knows, a blacked out one would be more likely a target
because there is something inside worth taking the time to protect more.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 12:38 PM
Subject: R
05 11:28 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: Single camera bags
>
>
> Wow! Now that's a nice feature. OK, that's a bit sarcastic ... but,
> seriously, why would anyone want that? It just screams out that you're
> carrying camera gear.
>
> Sh
Wow! Now that's a nice feature. OK, that's a bit sarcastic ... but,
seriously, why would anyone want that? It just screams out that you're
carrying camera gear.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Don Sanderson
> I have a couple of the Pentax holster bags [...]
> They're the all black ones w
n the shoulder strap. More could go on
your belt.
(Apologies for the Nikon lens caps, they were cheap.) ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 11:05 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: Single c
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 3:33 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Single camera bags
>
>
> Hi Gang.
>
> I'v read the bag thread, and they seem to be more ge
At 08:07 AM 27/03/2005 , Bob wrote:
>I don't like to change lenses either, so when I'm shooting I prefer to
>have a small bag or belt system just for film and bits & pieces.
Thought that's what pockets were for. Will some day get a pocketed vest
for warmer weather which seems to be getting more
Hi,
Sunday, March 27, 2005, 2:33:12 AM, brooksdj wrote:
> Hi Gang.
> I'v read the bag thread, and they seem to be more geared to more than 1 piece
> of
> equipment.
> Because i don't like to change lenses once i'm, at a show,i plan on taking
> the istD and
> either the
> A28 or 28-105 for tak
On Mar 27, 2005, at 7:07 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://www.tiffen.com/domkecat08.htm
The middle bag on this page is worthy of consideration. A few friends
have
one and they love it. I love the Domke that I have as well., which is
the
F-803 (also worthy of consideration if carrying a little m
Hi Dave
http://www.tiffen.com/domkecat08.htm
The middle bag on this page is worthy of consideration. A few friends have
one and they love it. I love the Domke that I have as well., which is the
F-803 (also worthy of consideration if carrying a little more gear).
Shel
> [Original Messag
On Mar 27, 2005, at 1:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because i don't like to change lenses once i'm, at a show,i plan on
taking the istD and
either the A28 or 28-105 for taking presentation shots. I thought a
bag that could clip on a belt
would do the trick.
Another vote for the Lowepro toploade
largest
i have, the Toploader 65 AW, has a weather cover and lets me slip in a few
more items like another set of batteries, more filters, and such.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 4:33 AM
Subject: Single camera bags
H
> Because i don't like to change lenses once i'm, at a show,i
> plan on taking the istD and either the A28 or 28-105 for
> taking presentation shots. I thought a bag that could clip on
> a belt would do the trick.
>
> Anyone use this type of bag and want to comment on a brand or style.
>
> Dav
Hi Gang.
I'v read the bag thread, and they seem to be more geared to more than 1 piece of
equipment.
Because i don't like to change lenses once i'm, at a show,i plan on taking the
istD and
either the
A28 or 28-105 for taking presentation shots. I thought a bag that could clip on
a belt
would do
36 matches
Mail list logo
