Pentax is sort of like Minolta in that respect. Only Canon and Nikon fight
for the rarified area of 7+ FPS because they have to compete against each
other. Minolta's entire XXXsi line only did 3 FPS max and the high end
9000/9xi/9 top out in the 4-5.5 FPS range. Besides sports I find one other
Kent wrote:
Pentax is sort of like Minolta in that respect. Only Canon and Nikon fight
for the rarified area of 7+ FPS because they have to compete against each
other.
I'm sure film cameras that can do 5fps and more will be seen as pointless in the
future. High speed photography will be
On 28 Dec 2001 at 20:36, Pål Jensen wrote:
I'm sure film cameras that can do 5fps and more will be seen as pointless in the
future. High speed photography will be the area of digital in the very near
future. Wasting a roll in 3,6 seconds doesn't seem cost effective to me; not to
mention the
What happened to make film transport speed so important? Didn't sports
photogs learn how to use their equipment and get great shots in the days
before high speed motordrives? When I was shooting for our college yearbook
back in 1962-63, I used a rangefinder 35 and a Speed Graphic, and with a
Bill wrote:
What happened to make film transport speed so important? Didn't sports
photogs learn how to use their equipment and get great shots in the days
before high speed motordrives? When I was shooting for our college yearbook
back in 1962-63, I used a rangefinder 35 and a Speed
5 matches
Mail list logo
