Vs: Spotty F metering [WAS: Re: PZ-1p (8-segment) vs. MZ-S (6-segment) multi-patternmetering]

2002-08-21 Thread Raimo Korhonen
- Lähettäjä: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Päivä: 21. elokuuta 2002 21:11 Aihe: Spotty F metering [WAS: Re: PZ-1p (8-segment) vs. MZ-S (6-segment) multi-patternmetering] >Pål Jensen wrote: >> >= snipped = > >&

Spotty F metering [WAS: Re: PZ-1p (8-segment) vs. MZ-S (6-segment) multi-patternmetering]

2002-08-21 Thread Keith Whaley
Pål Jensen wrote: > = snipped = > The Pentax 6-segment meter is among the best in business. I haven't > directly compared the Z-1p meter with the MZ-S. However, my impression > is that if you're using slide film the MZ-S meter is better. The Z-1p > meter seem slight more tuned towards overex