Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:19 PM, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OTOH, I guess their professional stuntpilots. Of course I meant "they're professional stuntpilots". I'm clearly not a professional typist... cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresso

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:32 PM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What, like this?: > > Small > > > Large > > Isn't it dangerous for all those airplanes to t

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

> > From: AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/08/01 Fri AM 08:17:17 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Stitching the Unstitchable > > 2008/8/1 mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Remember I once did a

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

2008/8/1 AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/8/1 mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Remember I once did a manual mosaic of 20 or so... :-) >>> >>> Jostein >> >> Norwegian winter does have its useful side. > > heh. > > Maybe you remember which shot I'm thinking about too? Lighthouse? Cheers,

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

2008/8/1 mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Remember I once did a manual mosaic of 20 or so... :-) >> >> Jostein > > Norwegian winter does have its useful side. heh. Maybe you remember which shot I'm thinking about too? Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

> > From: AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/07/31 Thu PM 05:43:33 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: Stitching the Unstitchable > > Doug, > Do you mean panning shots? That'll probably look good, and be fairly >

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

Doug, Do you mean panning shots? That'll probably look good, and be fairly easy to stitch manually, if the panning speed is approximately the same in consecutive shots. It's not really difficult to stitch manually, btw, but time consuming. Remember I once did a manual mosaic of 20 or so... :-) J

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

That's what I thought, but I wasn't sure :-) If you want, email me some low res versions of the frames in question & I'll see what the software can do. Cheers, Dave 2008/7/31 Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > David Savage wrote: > >> Not sure what you mean by "temporal panorama" > > I guess

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

John Celio wrote: > If your background is blurred, I would seriously doubt any stitching > software would be able to line up each photo correctly. The programs > I've used rely on sharp detail and contrast in order to line things up, > and I was never able to get them to stitch images well that h

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

David Savage wrote: > Not sure what you mean by "temporal panorama" I guess what I meant was that in regular panoramas, the photographer is typically trying to make it look like it was one huge exposure in one instant. In the case of the one you showed of the airplane, and the one I'm thinkin

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

David Savage wrote: > What, like this?: > > Small > > > Large > Yeah, like that. I'm not sure mine is going to work out so well, though. The background is a lot

RE: Stitching the Unstitchable

> At a recent race, I got several sequences of shots with reasonable > (~30%) overlap. It occurred to me that they might look interesting if > pasted together into a "temporal panorama". Is this something that > conventional stitching software might be able to do, or am I going to > have to bite th

Re: Stitching the Unstitchable

What, like this?: Small Large PTGui & PS to clone out half people. Not sure what you mean by "temporal panorama" Cheers, Dave 2008/7/30 Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PR

Stitching the Unstitchable

Howdy, folks, At a recent race, I got several sequences of shots with reasonable (~30%) overlap. It occurred to me that they might look interesting if pasted together into a "temporal panorama". Is this something that conventional stitching software might be able to do, or am I going to have