Don't know about colour and contrast, but Fujifilms have finer grain for
certain, especially for high speed film.
regards,
Alan Chan
My normal film is Kodak Portra 160 or 400 NC. On early mornings under
cloudy conditions I use Kodak Max 800 because of the additional speed
and increased contrast
Bruce,
I shoot mostly retriever hunt tests and field trials. I had three
weekends in a row in October where it rained everyday. When I came
home after the first weekend, you couldn't tell what color my truck was
for all the mud. After the third weekend of rain, it kind of dawned on
me why I
Ken,
I haven't noticed any real problems with the NPZ, but then, I haven't
shot lots of it. It did seem on the cool side (typical for Fuji), but
no real problems.
If you are shooting only 35mm, there is also Supra 800. It is much
more contrasty than Portra 800 and maybe finer grained. Certainl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Ken Archer asked:
> > I don't particulary like the color and the
> > added grain of the Max 800, however. Has anyone used a
> film that gives
> > the color and grain of Portra NC with additional speed
> and contr
Ken,
I really haven't used it outside too much. But its really not going to
be a higher contrast film I would say.
How about Kodak Supra 800? It is supposed to have higher contrast and
punchy colors.
Michael
Ken Archer wrote:
Mike,
Since I am usually working under rather "blah" conditions
Bruce,
Does the NPZ 800 have the exaggerated colors that most Fuji films seem
to have?
On Friday 13 December 2002 06:34 pm, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Ken,
>
> The two to try are Portra 800 and Fuji NPZ 800. There was a recent
> thread on this. The bottom line seems to be that the Portra should
> b
Mike,
Since I am usually working under rather "blah" conditions when I need
the 800 film, I need something with a little more contrast in it. I
have heard that Portra 800 has about the same kind of contrast as
160/400 NC, is that true?
On Friday 13 December 2002 06:35 pm, Michael Cross wrote:
Ken Archer asked:
> I don't particulary like the color and the
> added grain of the Max 800, however. Has anyone used a film that gives
> the color and grain of Portra NC with additional speed and contrast?
They won't be quite the same look as Portra 400 NC, but you'll
probably be happier with
Ken,
I heartily recommend Portra 800. Give it a try.
Michael Cross
Ken Archer wrote:
My normal film is Kodak Portra 160 or 400 NC. On early mornings under
cloudy conditions I use Kodak Max 800 because of the additional speed
and increased contrast. I don't particulary like the color and
Ken,
The two to try are Portra 800 and Fuji NPZ 800. There was a recent
thread on this. The bottom line seems to be that the Portra should be
shot more about 640 and the NPZ is a true 800.
Bruce
Friday, December 13, 2002, 4:22:10 AM, you wrote:
KA> My normal film is Kodak Portra 160 or 400
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> My normal film is Kodak Portra 160 or 400 NC. On early
> mornings under
> cloudy conditions I use Kodak Max 800 because of the
> additional speed
> and increased contrast. I don't particulary like the color and the
>
My normal film is Kodak Portra 160 or 400 NC. On early mornings under
cloudy conditions I use Kodak Max 800 because of the additional speed
and increased contrast. I don't particulary like the color and the
added grain of the Max 800, however. Has anyone used a film that gives
the color and
12 matches
Mail list logo
