Sv: Re: MZ-S Bracketing

Thanks Mark Very useful. BR Jens > > Fra: Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dato: 2001/08/17 Fri AM 03:50:39 CEST > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: Re: MZ-S Bracketing > > At 10:56 PM 8/15/01 +0200, you wrote: > >Hi all > >I just read the Test of MZ-S in Amateur Photography (UK) july edition. Th

Sv: Re: MZ-S Bracketing

Thanks Paal Regards Jens > > Fra: Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dato: 2001/08/15 Wed PM 11:37:56 CEST > Til: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Emne: Re: MZ-S Bracketing > > Jens wrote: > > > I just read the Test of MZ-S in Amateur Photography (UK) july edition. The author >said AB could only "reach" on

Sv: Re: MZ-S Bracketing

Thanks Paal Regards Jens > > Fra: Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dato: 2001/08/15 Wed PM 11:37:56 CEST > Til: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Emne: Re: MZ-S Bracketing > > Jens wrote: > > > I just read the Test of MZ-S in Amateur Photography (UK) july edition. The author >said AB could only "reach" on

Sv: Re: MZ-S Bracketing

Hi Because print machines correct themselves. A brackketing -1,0,+1 hasn't much value to print photographers - the prints will be almost identical! Regards Jensl > > Fra: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dato: 2001/08/15 Wed PM 11:09:53 CEST > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: Re: MZ-S Bracket