I have found the MZ-M screen in MX is a lot easier to focus too. No more
struggle with macro shots.
regards,
Alan Chan
Rules are made to be broken and I think you'll find that Pentax did just
that
with the introduction of the new 60 series of LX screens. They are bright
and
"snappy" to focus.
_
On 23 Jun 2003 at 14:42, T Rittenhouse wrote:
> Rule:
> Fine ground glass = bright image, difficult to focus
> Course ground glass = dim image, easy to focus
>
> As in all such tradeoffs, you need to find the balance that works best for
> you.
Rules are made to be broken and I think you'll find
Are the PZ-1P and MZ-S screens the same size
and configuration? Are they brighter than
the LX screens?
AFAIK, Z/PZ and MZ/ZX screens have identical dimensions. LX/MX screens are
slightly bigger. And yes, they are brighter & smoother than original MX/LX
screens. I use the MZ-M screen in MX and fo
I agree. That may be why I like KXen so much.
Dim but _very_ easy to focus.
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Rule:
Fine ground glass = bright image, difficult to focus
Course ground glass = dim image, easy to focus
As in all such tradeoffs, you need to find the balance that works best for
you.
Vlcek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: Swapping screens across bodies
> > I'm aware that LX and MX screens can be swapped
> > across bodies (standard caveat: LX screen in
> > M
> I'm aware that LX and MX screens can be swapped
> across bodies (standard caveat: LX screen in
> MX body- add +1/3 to EV).
>
> Are the PZ-1P and MZ-S screens the same size
> and configuration? Are they brighter than
> the LX screens?
> -Lon
Hi Lon,
the crosscompatibility is there, but not
6 matches
Mail list logo
