Re: Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom

2002-08-02 Thread Alan Chan
>The lens I have is certainly coated. It may not have been done the way >Pentax do their SMC lenses, but it looks okay to me. By the way, the >coating >of most lenses is made up of more than one layer. Pentax refer to their >coating as 'Super' but there is no evidence to support the belief that i

Re: Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom

2002-08-02 Thread Don Williams Finland
CTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:56 PM Subject: Re: Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom > I owned one for a couple of weeks. In fact, these two submissions were taken with it. > http://pug.komkon.org/LX_Gallery/nijm750.html > http://pug.komkon.org/02feb/beer_cs.ht

Re: Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom

2002-08-01 Thread wendy beard
Wendy >Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:36:20 +0300 >From: "Don Williams Finland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom >Hi all, >I have a Takumar-A 28 - 80 mm, f3.5 - 4.5 'Macro' Zoom is this any good? The >pictures that my daughter took with t

Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom

2002-08-01 Thread Don Williams Finland
Hi all, I have a Takumar-A 28 - 80 mm, f3.5 - 4.5 'Macro' Zoom is this any good? The pictures that my daughter took with this lens a year ago seem reasonable. It came attached to a P30 I found in a shop in the city. I put the lens on an ME Super and gave it to my offspring to use for snap-shots.