At 16:13 13/07/01, you wrote:

Thanks Paul.

I got told by a different source that it can be used on a 645 or 67 camera 
(not sure which one), with an adapter that was sold for them a long, long, 
long time ago. I also got told it is a very sharp lens.

It is way too big and bulky for what I'd considered using it for, and 
happily passed it up.

I missed out on a 17mm Pentax M(?) fisheye for $120 today as well. I saw 
the for sale sign on the shelf at one of the camera shops and it had 
already been sold. It was still there, so I got a look at it. It didn't 
unduly worry me that it had been sold, I need a new printer more than a 
fisheye lens. A friend picked up a mint M 300/4 for about $150 yesterday 
and had the bragging rights today. I offered him $200 for it but he said 
nononono it has red backs in it, fungus, rabies, and it bites. LOL

It seems that every Pentaxite in Perth is busily selling off stuff at 
present, seemingly to fund the purchase of an MZ-S. I need one for 
photographing horse racing. The far right AF point has sold me on the 
camera. I just have to save up the readies.

To top off my day our dog had an attack of something. He was either 
poisoned or bitten/stung by something at it looked really bad. A visit to 
the vet, a stay of a couple of hours and he was allowed to come home a new 
dog. I'll make a couple of offerings to the dog dieties tonight and hope 
he's fully recovered in the morning.

Enough rambling

Cheers


>Yep, pages 88,89 & 92 of "Asahi Pentax and Pentax SLR 35mm cameras 1952 -
>1989" by Danilo Cecchi
>There are two versions. The original Asshiflex (M37) which also appeared
>with an M42 mount and a later M42 version. The earlier one had a rectangular
>black tripod mount, the later one a smaller, round silver one.
>
>I've got the early one in m42, but like the later 500 f4.5, the mount is on
>a tube that disconnects to allow filters to be screwed on..
>Two elements only. Big (>500mm long). Heavy.
>
>I haven't used it much so can't comment on performance, and I don't have any
>other 500's to compare with.
>FWIW I paid AUS$300 at auction for it in around 8 condition (no dings and
>only minor scratching, glass ok) with caps but no case.
>
>Paul Ewins
>Melbourne Australia
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jon Hope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 3:59 PM
>Subject: Takumar 500mm 1:5 Screw Mount Lens
>
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > There is one of these for sale here and I was curious enough to go and
>have
> > a look at it. I can't find a reference to the 1:5 500mm takumar screw
> > mount. Is there anywhere that would have some info on it?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > Relax! Take life as it comes, you can't chase the sun, you can't race the
>wind
> >
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> >
>
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Jon

Relax! Take life as it comes, you can't chase the sun, you can't race the wind

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to