On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Pat Curran wrote:
Thanks to all who responded to my request for a rating of the above lens.
Looks like it's one to avoid; pity as KEH have one rated 'bargain' ($94.00)
at the moment.
You can get a K135/3.5 or M135/3.5 easy with that kind of money. If
you add customs and
Kostas Kavoussanakis mused:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Pat Curran wrote:
Thanks to all who responded to my request for a rating of the above lens.
Looks like it's one to avoid; pity as KEH have one rated 'bargain' ($94.00)
at the moment.
You can get a K135/3.5 or M135/3.5 easy with that
]
Sendt: 29. november 2004 18:32
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Thanks Guys (135/2.8 A Rating)
Kostas Kavoussanakis mused:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Pat Curran wrote:
Thanks to all who responded to my request for a rating of the above
lens.
Looks like it's one to avoid; pity as KEH have one
Thanks to all who responded to my request for a rating of the above lens.
Looks like it's one to avoid; pity as KEH have one rated 'bargain' ($94.00)
at the moment.
It looks like the SMC 'M' lenses very often out do their newer 'A' stable
mates from what I can see reading PDML posts.
I have two
It looks like the SMC 'M' lenses very often out do their newer 'A'
stable mates from what I can see reading PDML posts.
In my opinion, I do not think that this is usually the case, Pat.
In many cases, the M and A lenses are optically virtually identical.
Sometimes there may be mere subtle
As ;)
Pat
- Original Message -
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pat Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Thanks Guys (135/2.8 A Rating)
It looks like the SMC 'M' lenses very often out do their newer 'A'
stable mates from what I can see reading
6 matches
Mail list logo
