Sylwester Pietrzyk escribió:
> On 29.10.06, at 16:09 , Bob Shell wrote:
>
>> This doesn't mean it was used on a Pentax camera, though. National
>> Geographic used to have an in-house repair shop that also did
>> modifications, and they often modified lenses to fit different camera
>> systems. Sa
On 29.10.06, at 16:09 , Bob Shell wrote:
> This doesn't mean it was used on a Pentax camera, though. National
> Geographic used to have an in-house repair shop that also did
> modifications, and they often modified lenses to fit different camera
> systems. Sadly that all fell victim to budget cu
On Oct 29, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> Shel, go to:
> http://www.nationalgeographic.com/
> just type in "search" field word "Pentax" and see the results. You
> will find some articles where either 645 or 67 were used for taking
> photos. In one article I believe Pentax 35 mm ca
On 27.10.06, at 23:10 , Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> The National Geographic has some great photos in every issue, never
> more
> evident today while I was perusing a back issue. Is there a way to
> find out
> whether a photo was taken with film or digital, and maybe even
> information
> on the c
I own 35/3.5 MF version.
I love the lens ... very good. Almost no distortions.
Got from KEH a bargain for approx USD 350.
New AF version is even better.
Gasha
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Speaking of Pentax 645 ... someone has offered me a Pentax 645 with
> 35mm lens at a very low price. I'm tem
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
>>Speaking of Pentax 645 ... someone has offered me a Pentax 645 with
>>35mm lens at a very low price. I'm tempted ... seems like a 645
>>analogue of my Hassy SWC. Always liked 645 and 6x6 with a wide lens.
>>
>>How good is the 35mm lens for
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>Speaking of Pentax 645 ... someone has offered me a Pentax 645 with
>35mm lens at a very low price. I'm tempted ... seems like a 645
>analogue of my Hassy SWC. Always liked 645 and 6x6 with a wide lens.
>
>How good is the 35mm lens for the 645? anyone have any experien
Speaking of Pentax 645 ... someone has offered me a Pentax 645 with
35mm lens at a very low price. I'm tempted ... seems like a 645
analogue of my Hassy SWC. Always liked 645 and 6x6 with a wide lens.
How good is the 35mm lens for the 645? anyone have any experience
with it?
Godfrey
On Oct
On Oct 27, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> The National Geographic has some great photos in every issue, never
> more
> evident today while I was perusing a back issue. Is there a way to
> find out
> whether a photo was taken with film or digital, and maybe even
> information
> on
essage -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML"
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 7:10 AM
Subject: The Cameras of National Geographic
> The National Geographic has some great photos in every issue, never more
> evident today while I was perusin
Ahhh - good idea. Thanks.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Scott Loveless
> You'll probably have better luck researching specific photographers.
> There are quite a few interviews and bios available online.
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > The National Geographic has some great photos in every
Shel,
You'll probably have better luck researching specific photographers.
There are quite a few interviews and bios available online. e.g.
David Alan Harvey used to shoot with a Leica and 28mm, 35mm and 50mm
lenses, but has switched to a Nikon digital system. Sam Abell has
stated in more than o
The National Geographic has some great photos in every issue, never more
evident today while I was perusing a back issue. Is there a way to find out
whether a photo was taken with film or digital, and maybe even information
on the cameras or film that was used?
One of the stories in that back issu
13 matches
Mail list logo
