I was going to let this drop, but I want to say some things to
explain my previous posts.
First, I am grateful to Shel for pointing us to a very powerful and
moving set of photographs -- and probably also an example of
found art, since these were undoubtedly made for data purposes,
not display.
This must be "Let's-dump-on-Shel week." He does not need a defense from
me, but I am amused at the tenor of some of the comments in this thread.
So I will add a couple of my reactions to the reactions.
1) Is the series of photos he pointed to OT? Yes, I suppose it is in the
narrowest sense, since
In that case it is OT.
Frits
> Luis Pinar wrote:
> >
> > What's the point? Were they taken with Pentax equipment?
>
> See Treena's comment below:
>
> These photos are both disturbing and heartbreaking
> at the same time. I referred this website to my
> husband, who believe
Interesting Buford, thanks for the insight.
Norm
Buford Terrell wrote:
> At 07:30 AM 05/07/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >Luis Pinar wrote:
> >>
> >> What's the point? Were they taken with Pentax equipment?
> >
> >See Treena's comment below:
> >
> > These photos are both disturbing and heartbre
At 07:30 AM 05/07/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Luis Pinar wrote:
>>
>> What's the point? Were they taken with Pentax equipment?
>
>See Treena's comment below:
>
> These photos are both disturbing and heartbreaking
> at the same time. I referred this website to my
> husband, who bel
This is a link to a series of arrest photographs of the same
individual over the course of 10 years. She was about 31~32 years
old at the time of the first photo. It's not a pleasant series of
photos.
http://www.hollywoodpolice.org/VIN_CAT/pic79_11.htm
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
