Yep. It launched on time as far as I can tell from subsequent news reports.
It was supposed to be visible for a few seconds from where I live ...
visible longer (and higher in the sky) from closer to the coast, but I
didn't have time to drive down there between the time I found out about
it and
Apparently it launched successfully around noon time today according to
this story.
http://wtkr.com/2014/07/07/antares-rocket-successfully-launches-from-wallops-island/
On 7/13/2014 1:29 PM, John wrote:
I saw in the local news this morning that NASA was launching a supply
rocket to the ISS
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:42 +0100, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Missed the focus. Dammit.
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/content/L119_large.html
Yeah - that could have been great
The first six here are new:
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
Nice work. I really like
I really like the woman sitting by the picture.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Missed the focus. Dammit.
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/content/L119_large.html
The first six here are new:
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
B
--
PDML
Ah, but now its art.
Dave
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Missed the focus. Dammit.
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/content/L119_large.html
The first six here are new:
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Steven Desjardins
I really like the woman sitting by the picture.
Thanks. It's quite a nice café when they deign to serve you.
B
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Missed the focus.
On Jul 31, 2011, at 14:42, Bob W wrote:
Missed the focus. Dammit.
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/content/L119_large.html
Looks more like motion blur to me! Not 100% objectionable for this type of
shot, however.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
On 8/1/2011 17:51, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 31, 2011, at 14:42, Bob W wrote:
Missed the focus. Dammit.
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/content/L119_large.html
Looks more like motion blur to me! Not 100% objectionable for this type of
shot, however.
-Charles
--
Charles
Missed the focus. Dammit.
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/content/L119_large.html
Looks more like motion blur to me! Not 100% objectionable for this
type of shot, however.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
On 8/1/2011 18:16, Bob W wrote:
Missed the focus. Dammit.
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/content/L119_large.html
Looks more like motion blur to me! Not 100% objectionable for this
type of shot, however.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Ann Sanfedele
Sent: 01 August 2011 23:33
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: One that got away
On 8/1/2011 18:16, Bob W wrote:
Missed the focus. Dammit.
http://www.web
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:42:52 +0100
Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
The first six here are new:
http://www.web-options.com/Recent/
enjoyed going through that. especially loved the second one...
--
regards, subash
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 14, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I was in college and had shot 35mm during HS and had also made good use of my
GIII just before getting the K1000. So when a popular speaker came to the
college I got there early and got a front-row set. Then I sat on the floor
and
/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
Subject: You shoulda seen the one that got away! (Was Re: The silliest
thingyou ever did with your camera)
On Apr 14, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I was in college and had shot 35mm during HS
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool, Dan! Enter it in the art contest. :-)
-bmw
I thought it had to be in BW and grainy to be considered art.:-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
That's SO twentieth century. These days, ANYTHING can be considered art.
Dan
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:56 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought it had to be in BW and grainy to be considered art.:-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I have a banana peal on a plinth, asking 1,000,000.
On 6/10/2010 1:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's SO twentieth century. These days, ANYTHING can be considered art.
Dan
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:56 PM, David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought it had to be in BW and
2010/6/10 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
I have a banana peal on a plinth, asking 1,000,000.
On a CLEFT STICK you could ask that... but a plinth... aw maaan...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
is it this one?
http://www.talkaboutdesign.com/img/bananapeel.jpg
I have a banana peal on a plinth, asking 1,000,000.
On 6/10/2010 1:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's SO twentieth century. These days, ANYTHING can be considered
art.
Dan
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:56 PM,
That's better than most of what I saw in the Tate Modern.
Dan
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
is it this one?
http://www.talkaboutdesign.com/img/bananapeel.jpg
I have a banana peal on a plinth, asking 1,000,000.
On 6/10/2010 1:30 PM, Daniel J.
Le 08/06/10 19:59, Daniel J. Matyola a écrit :
or give it a title like Study in
Color and Motion #72 and enter it in an art contest.
I definitely would do that !!! it's a fun photo , a kind of Superfawn in
action .. going so fast no camera can catch him . lol
besides I like the colours
2010/6/9 Madame RD romd...@orange.fr:
or give it a title like Study in
Color and Motion #72 and enter it in an art contest.
I definitely would do that !!! it's a fun photo , a kind of Superfawn in
action .. going so fast no camera can catch him . lol
besides I like the colours .
Thanks, Dominique and Ecke. I also consider it a fun image, even
though it is by no means a good photograph is any sense of the term.
I especially like the way the fawn's feet are blurred into large
rectangular boots; that really shows how fast his little legs were
movint.
Dan
On Wed, Jun 9,
This one is submitted for the humor value.
Photography is like fishing: sometimes it seems that the big catch
always gets away.
Over the weekend, I looked out my window to see three fawns playing in
the back yard. (By now, you all know how I love to photograph deer,
and especially fawns.) I
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
This one is submitted for the humor value.
Photography is like fishing: sometimes it seems that the big catch
always gets away.
Over the weekend, I looked out my window to see three fawns playing in
the back yard. (By now, you all know how I love to photograph deer,
On 2010-06-08 13:59, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11102572
:-)
That reminds me of my attempts to get decent photos of a deer that got
out onto the track at Road Atlanta during one of the early Petit le Mans
races. I was about as successful at stopping
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 12:42:47 -0500, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amateur camera = low priced, cheap junk.
Pro camera = high priced, cheap junk in black finish.
GRIN!
No one's made a black tape joke yet...
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 7/12/04, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
A black K2 is pretty collectible if it's in good condition.
Yes especially the professional version
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I was watching that auction. I was troubled by the 85 being described
as an M 85/1.8. Are you sure it wasn't an M 85/2? If I'm not mistaken,
I think all the other lenses were M versions.
Paul
On Dec 6, 2004, at 11:07 PM, Peter Spiro wrote:
This was a very nice set with a black K2 and six
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: The one that got away
On 7/12/04, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
A black K2 is pretty collectible if it's in good condition.
Yes especially the professional version
Cotty, the black one is the professional version.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: The one that got away
I was watching that auction. I was troubled by the 85 being
described as an M 85/1.8. Are you sure it wasn't an M 85/2? If I'm
not mistaken, I think all the other lenses were M versions.
If you look at all
On 7/12/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, the black one is the professional version.
Of course. I knew there was a way of telling. Is that bag that comes with
it a pro bag?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Of course not! Everyone knows that pros only use vests! :)
t
On 12/7/04 6:09, Cotty wrote:
Of course. I knew there was a way of telling. Is that bag that comes with
it a pro bag?
Amateur camera = low priced, cheap junk.
Pro camera = high priced, cheap junk in black finish.
GRIN!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
On 7/12/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, the black one is
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: The one that got away
On 7/12/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, the black one is the professional version.
Of course. I knew there was a way of telling. Is that bag that
comes with
it a pro bag?
Is it black?
William Robb
On 7/12/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Is it black?
Black vinyl.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: The one that got away
On 7/12/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Is it black?
Black vinyl.
Wannabe pro.
William Robb
If you look at the large version photo, you can see it's an f1.8.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I was watching that auction. I was troubled by the 85 being described
as an M 85/1.8. Are you sure it wasn't an M 85/2? If I'm not mistaken,
I think all the other lenses were M versions.
Paul
On Dec 6, 2004,
This was a very nice set with a black K2 and six lenses, including an 85mm
f/1.8.
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3856266592
I was the high bidder until one minute before the end of the auction. The
winner was a dealer, so watch for the individual items to re-appear on eBay.
On Dec 7, 2004, at 5:07 PM, Peter Spiro wrote:
This was a very nice set with a black K2 and six lenses, including an
85mm f/1.8.
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3856266592
I was the high bidder until one minute before the end of the auction.
The winner was a dealer, so watch
Dnia 15-04-2002 o godz. 6:28 Fred napisal(a):
I've already loaded the KX with HIE.
What is HIE, Glenn?
Fred
Well, I'm not Glenn but I happen to know. That's Kodak High
Speed Infrared film.
Maciej
---
Klub Koneserw
HIE is Kodak's black and white infrared film.
Well, is HIE an acronym? If so, what do the letters stand for?
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
should've seen the one that got away...
I've already loaded the KX with HIE.
What is HIE, Glenn?
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http
Fred,
HIE is High Speed Infrared film. Very nice to shoot but very difficult
(for me) to work with especially if you don't have a dark (really dark)
room to load/unload the camera.
Francis
Fred wrote:
I've already loaded the KX with HIE.
What is HIE, Glenn?
Fred
-
This message is
On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 11:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also put HIE in the Nishika and taped a strip of #25 gel
over its four lenses. Experiment time.
Now THAT sounds interesting. Let us know what you get.
As to IR 'looking right' for civil war re-enactments, I suppose it
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:01 AM, tom wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:27:29 -0400, T Rittenhouse wrote:
Highspeed Infrared Ektachrome.
It's not chrome though, it's b+w neg film.
The chrome colour IR stuff is called EIR.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
, April 15, 2002 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: You should've seen the one that got away...
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:01 AM, tom wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:27:29 -0400, T Rittenhouse wrote:
Highspeed Infrared Ektachrome.
It's not chrome though, it's b+w neg film.
The chrome colour IR
47 matches
Mail list logo
