I remember my days working with an old Speed Graphic. It was interesting
and challenging, but not something I care to repeat in the age of digital.
Dan Matyola
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 3:42 AM Alan C wrote:
> That really puts it into perspective! Mamiya used to make digital backs
> for their
Interesting. I have a Duaflex. Maybe I’ll have a go at this.
Paul
> On May 21, 2020, at 7:17 AM, Alan C wrote:
>
> They are all really the same thing. The first one is what I had in mind.
>
> Alan C
>
>> On 21-May-20 11:14 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
On May 21, 2020, at 12:41 AM, Alan C
They are all really the same thing. The first one is what I had in mind.
Alan C
On 21-May-20 11:14 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On May 21, 2020, at 12:41 AM, Alan C wrote:
That really puts it into perspective! Mamiya used to make digital backs for their
67 film bodies - Pentax never did. Now if
> On May 21, 2020, at 12:41 AM, Alan C wrote:
>
> That really puts it into perspective! Mamiya used to make digital backs for
> their 67 film bodies - Pentax never did. Now if someone could produce
> something similar for old SLR's as PJ suggests, it may yet be a proposition.
> Actually, I r
That really puts it into perspective! Mamiya used to make digital backs
for their 67 film bodies - Pentax never did. Now if someone could
produce something similar for old SLR's as PJ suggests, it may yet be a
proposition. Actually, I remember seeing a video of a Heath Robinson
device like that
> On May 20, 2020, at 9:27 PM, John wrote:
>
> So, how many have you signed up for?
Oddly, I’m not willing to spend that much money to reduce both usability and
image quality when I could run a couple rolls of expired film through those
cameras for a lot less money and bother.
--
Larry Col
So, how many have you signed up for?
On 5/17/2020 23:29:39, Larry Colen wrote:
The cool idea that just won’t die
And, they even make it on topic with this spotty:
https://ksr-ugc.imgix.net/assets/028/731/584/6d3b8d27fb9dfdb2fe8ac4d84f660fc1_original.gif?ixlib=rb-2.1.0&w=680&fit=max&v=15869113
Based on the big lump that will be on the back just under the
viewfinder, it looks like it will be extraordinary difficult to focus.
When somebody makes a sensor that I can slip into the film gate and
close the original back and keep the original ergonomics, I'll pass.
On 5/17/2020 11:29 PM,
> On 18 May 2020 at 04:29 Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> The cool idea that just won’t die
>
> And, they even make it on topic with this spotty:
>
> https://ksr-ugc.imgix.net/assets/028/731/584/6d3b8d27fb9dfdb2fe8ac4d84f660fc1_original.gif?ixlib=rb-2.1.0&w=680&fit=max&v=1586911320&auto=format&gi
And then they will go away again. And then come back again. I was a
regular Photokina visitor/customer/exhibitor from around 1978 to around
2010. There was a period of maybe 6 years that someone was showing this
type of product - just showing and looking for investment. Seems that is
was the sa
Larry, you know, that is really the same principle as scanning or
photographing a slide/negative.
Alan C
On 18-May-20 05:29 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
The cool idea that just won’t die
And, they even make it on topic with this spotty:
https://ksr-ugc.imgix.net/assets/028/731/584/6d3b8d27fb9dfdb2
The cool idea that just won’t die
And, they even make it on topic with this spotty:
https://ksr-ugc.imgix.net/assets/028/731/584/6d3b8d27fb9dfdb2fe8ac4d84f660fc1_original.gif?ixlib=rb-2.1.0&w=680&fit=max&v=1586911320&auto=format&gif-q=50&q=92&s=ac59ac9840cb207f50ac2686aa38fb03
About $360 with
12 matches
Mail list logo
