I would second that. I like tripod mounts on lenses that need them.
I have this lens and can't think of any need for one. It is small
and light enough that it would only get in the way.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, October 6, 2008, 5:16:03 PM, you wrote:
AM> Tokina versions of Pentax lense
Tokina versions of Pentax lenses are not available in K mount. The
only way to get the Tokina is to switch to Nikon or Canon.
Also the lens is small enough that there is no advantage to a tripod
mount. It's really a very compact lens for its range.
-Adam
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Tom Lesse
Greetings:
I hope I am not being sacrilegious asking here about the Tokina version
of the 50-135/2.8, but I'd really like this range in a lens with a
tripod mount. Does anyone know whether Pentax is planning to offer the
lens with a mount, or if not, where I can buy a Tokina?
Thank you
Tom
I think I was looking at it today, (though I didn't notice what month it
was).
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Is the April issue of PopPhot on the stands yet?
>
> Shel
>
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: Joseph Tainter
>>
>
>
>> There is a wonderful test of this lens in the April Popular Ph
Is the April issue of PopPhot on the stands yet?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Joseph Tainter
> There is a wonderful test of this lens in the April Popular Photography.
> The results are very good. Very, very good. Pentax has designed another
> great lens. It is sharp across the board, e
Joseph I really hope the other reviews of Tokina (I don't care much)
but specially Pentax version will be as good as your comments lead me
to beleive.
Pentax needs that as well as we do. Expensive times ahead indeed.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX,
There is a wonderful test of this lens in the April Popular Photography.
The results are very good. Very, very good. Pentax has designed another
great lens. It is sharp across the board, even sharp wide open at all
focal lengths. You can't ask for more.
I guess the DA* 50-135 F2.8 will have to
Hi,
as Tokina rep said me last saturday at Photokina - the same optics, the
same coatings (sic!), just without ultrasonic focussing. So it's a very
good indication indeed...
Has anyone seen any pictures taken with 16-50/2.8 ??? They showed me
some prints, but unfortunately couldn't give any pic
> Welcome back Alan!
>
> Kostas
Thanks Kostas. :-)
Regards,
Alan Chan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Welcome back Alan!
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Not a DA*, but might be an indication.
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2006/09/29/4734.html
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
11 matches
Mail list logo