Hi,
Lon Williamson wrote:
>
> A really cheap 4 section monopod with a small ballhead
> mounted on it works well and is not as fiddly if you
> need to re-compose. Anyone else ever try it this way?
>
> >> Try another test: Put a support of some sort from the camera
> >> body to a tripod leg, see
A really cheap 4 section monopod with a small ballhead
mounted on it works well and is not as fiddly if you
need to re-compose. Anyone else ever try it this way?
Try another test: Put a support of some sort from the camera
body to a tripod leg, see if that doesn't do some good.
Found a pic at Bjørn's site.
Meet the PentaPod solution! :-)
http://www.naturfotograf.com/sacht3.html
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:39 AM
Subject: Re:
Hi,
Alan Chan wrote:
>
> I remember I saw a photo which shown somebody mounted 2 tripods - one for
> the lens, one for the camera. But don't think I am going to try it, partly
> because I have one tripod only. Also, it was a test to see which was the
> best way for me to shoot, and I think I have
I remember I saw a photo which shown somebody mounted 2 tripods - one for
the lens, one for the camera. But don't think I am going to try it, partly
because I have one tripod only. Also, it was a test to see which was the
best way for me to shoot, and I think I have my own answer already. :-)
On 3 Feb 2004 at 18:42, Andre Langevin wrote:
> >When I want a lack of vibration I use my Manfrotto 058/225
> >combination, anything else is a compromise.
> >Rob Studdert
>
> What about Berlebach wooden tripods?
I've heard a lot about them but never used them, the only experience I've had
usin
On 3 Feb 2004 at 15:52, Alan Chan wrote:
> I haven't seen the 058, but 055 & 190 only. I don't know much about
> Manfrotto CF tripods. I have found the Gitzo G1349 is more resistance to
> vibration than their own aluminium equivalences. But the interesting
> question is, shouldn't the results b
Just when I thought the tripod collar of the F*300/4.5 should be a pro, I
went out and did some shooting on RVP100F just to see how much improvement
it actually made. I took 4 sets of pictures with this lens using the Z-1p
(right, no *ist D, can't afford it yet ) at every stop (4.5, 5.6, 8, 11,
8 matches
Mail list logo
