At 09:59 AM 8/28/01 -0400, Bill Owens wrote: >My thoughts on the MZ-S vs. PZ-1p debate. > >Being financially challenged, I had to trade my PZ-1p and ZX-5n in order to >obtain my MZ-S, so I can't give a head to head comparison. > >However, I find the MZ-S to be much more intuitive to use than the PZ-1p or >even the ZX-5n. In fact, in seems to be an excellent compromise between the >two cameras. .... Bill - I agree totally, and hope that my comments re flash compensation on the Mz-S are not construed as a criticism of the camera. It is a fine and ergonomic camera and a joy to work with. I don't even have a gripe with the lack of in body flash compensation - Pentax designed this function to be in the external flash unit, and I think that makes a lot of sense since it will allow this feature to be available in any newer TTL body. Trying to achieve in body flash compensation, which was clearly not designed into the body, is possible but really defeats the excellent ergonomics of the Mz-S. Doing it the way the engineers intended - via the AF360FTZ - will be wonderful. - MCC - - - - - - - - - - Mark Cassino Kalamazoo, MI [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - Photos: http://www.markcassino.com - - - - - - - - - - - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
