Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ

2004-02-01 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Kevin, What film do you use? I use Fugi Sensia Kind regards Kevin -- __ (_ \ _) ) | / / _ ) / _ | /

Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
Oh, man. Am I glad you wrote that. I have been having the same problem and it has been driving me insane. It's haunted me for the past two months. I've searched all over the flash and camera for some setting that I have wrong. The whole issue is exasperated by the fact that when not using the

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Kevin Thornsberry Subject: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .) How many people are experiencing this problem and what are you doing about it? I've tried some to use camera exposure compensations between +0.5EV

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
Wasn't there a discussion about this some weeks ago - I think that the underexposure related to the ISO settings? Can't remember exactly but would be very grateful if someone would enlighten me so that I don't have to face the same problems when mine arrives! TIA, tan. Oh, man. Am I glad you

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread Bruce Dayton
owners. -- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, January 31, 2004, 7:20:03 AM, you wrote: WR - Original Message - WR From: Kevin Thornsberry WR Subject: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an WR interesting . . .) How many people are experiencing this problem and what

RE: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread tom
-Original Message- From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 1:05 PM To: William Robb Tom will be able to give the best report, but from my memory and others I have heard, ANY digital camera doesn't seem to be as consistent with TTL flash as

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread Frits Wüthrich
Try shooting at ISO 400 when using a flash. I get underexposure at ISO 200 with my Metz 40MZ-2, with the build in flash unit it works OK at 200 though. On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 16:07, Kevin Thornsberry wrote: Oh, man. Am I glad you wrote that. I have been having the same problem and it has

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try shooting at ISO 400 when using a flash. I get underexposure at ISO 200 with my Metz 40MZ-2, with the build in flash unit it works OK at 200 though. I mostly use studio type flash and have experienced the same

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Kevin, That sounds a bit odd. Since the camera is not involved at all in the exposure setting (I assume). When I use studio flash (Alien Bees) and meter with my Gossen Luna Pro Digital F, the exposures are just about right. I would think that perhaps your meter is calibrated just a bit

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ (Was:D - Not Pentax but an interesting . . .)

2004-01-31 Thread Frits Wüthrich
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 23:14, Kevin Waterson wrote: This one time, at band camp, Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try shooting at ISO 400 when using a flash. I get underexposure at ISO 200 with my Metz 40MZ-2, with the build in flash unit it works OK at 200 though. I mostly use

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ

2004-01-31 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mostly use studio type flash and have experienced the same underexposure. I assume you mean you were using TTL here which gave you at least one stop underexposure? No, I do not use TTL for flash. I set everything

Re: Underexposed *istD w/ AF360FGZ

2004-01-31 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Kevin, What film do you use? If negative, could still be the latitude of the film that is rescuing you from the underexposure. Digital responds more like slide film. What happens if you do an outdoor shot manually with an external meter reading on both slide film and *istD. Seems to me