On Friday, May 24, 2002, at 06:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You don't , because you will be airside.
Phew...had me in a bit of a panic.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit t
On Thursday, May 23, 2002, at 02:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, but you'll be airside. I can't believe you got a UK visa??
Uh, do I need one to go through the airport and change planes?
God, if I do there's hell to pay at my travel agency.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Disc
In a message dated 23/05/02 16:22:10 GMT Daylight Time, Aaron writes:
<< I'll be at Heathrow for a few hours, does that count? :) Maybe we can
have a mini PDML meeting in the airport? I will have the 67 and the
75mm on me. >>
Yes, but you'll be airside. I can't believe you got a UK visa??
On Thursday, May 23, 2002, at 04:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I'm quite fond of Calvin & Hobbes at the moment.
My favourite ones are where the guilt of breaking his dad's binoculars
overwhelms Calvin. Them, or 'Is opposite day over yet?' ' "Yes".'
> BTW Aaron, are you going through Lon
In a message dated 23/05/02 12:04:56 GMT Daylight Time, Dave writes:
<< I'm still suffering from the effects of temptation, seeing a nice 165mm
> f/2.8 in the Jessops pro shop in New Oxford St when I was with Bob. I
> should have written down the price. Luckily they're open on Sundays, and
>
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm still suffering from the effects of temptation, seeing a nice 165mm
> f/2.8 in the Jessops pro shop in New Oxford St when I was with Bob. I
> should have written down the price. Luckily they're open on Sundays, and
> I'm going up this
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> > Far better than Doonsbury or
> > Dilbert
>
> Doonsbury is better than Dilbert!
I'm quite fond of Calvin & Hobbes at the moment.
BTW Aaron, are you going through London on your way to Prague? If you
spend a weekend there we might be able to have another "gathering", ma
I think bran flakes would be just fine for me (hoping not to start a
bran v Ex-Lax debate).
Robert Harris wrote:
> And I would rather eat a whole package
> of Ex-Lax for breakfast than see
> another debate over whether primes
> or zooms are better. :)
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Bill Owens wrote:
> The argument between zooms and primes is unwinnable...
>
> It's kinda like the argument about what makes a "professional" camera.
It's worse, because everybody knows enough not to take the pro camera
stuff seriously, but I think some people take the nonsense of zooms vs.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> My comment wasn't intended to start an argument or debate about zooms v
> primes. It was a rhetorical question and an offhand way to suggest that
> a faster prime might be a better alternative than a slower zoom in
> Maris's situation.
>
> Perhaps I should have phrased m
ublic -i.e. politics)
Original Message:
-
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:59:08 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unwinnable arguments, was Re: Film for graduation
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, at 09:11 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Far b
Bill Owens wrote:
>The argument between zooms and primes is unwinnable on either side. Those
>of us that prefer zooms will not be convinced to replace them with primes,
>and those of you who prefer primes will not be convinced to replace them
>with zooms.
Personally I don't *prefer* either; I f
And what about Boondocks?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Unwinnable arguments, was Re: Film for graduation
> On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, at
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, at 09:11 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Far better than Doonsbury or
> Dilbert
Doonsbury is better than Dilbert!
-Aaron
...speaking of unwinnable arguments...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow th
14 matches
Mail list logo
