Interesting, Peter. Thanks for this. I'm quite fond of the Series 1 70-210/3.5
version 1, although I rarely use it any more. It is a tank. It's quite good
optically. Of course I haven't compared it to the other two versions, so they
may well be better. But it's a relatively fast, high quality
Oh yes, one other small difference, the v.2 lens has a slightly cooler
lens cap...
P. J. Alling wrote:
So I decided to write a review. I hope people find it useful.
I acquired an almost New Vivitar series 1 version 3 not too long ago,
and I've decided to do a comparative review verses the
It has to be either version 3 or 4. the first two are pre A mount.
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 14:32, P. J. Alling wrote:
Problems.
In every case the exposure was underexposed
until f4.0 then exposures were identical for each stop to f22.
(These f
stops were
P. J. Alling wrote:
Well yes, there was a noticeable problem with the v.3 lens. I've come
to the conclusion that the aperture response may not be as linear as
required by the Pentax specification.
Yep. I've found the same thing with my sample of this lens.
It's a good thing that bracketing
So I decided to write a review. I hope people find it useful.
I acquired an almost New Vivitar series 1 version 3 not too long ago,
and I've decided to do a comparative review verses the version 2 model
that I've had for a number of years now. First off I'd like to thank
Mark Roberts for
On Nov 30, 2007, at 14:32, P. J. Alling wrote:
Problems.
In every case the exposure was underexposed
until f4.0 then exposures were identical for each stop to f22.
(These f
stops were controlled from the camera body. The green button was
pretty
much dead on every time).
I find
6 matches
Mail list logo
