Ernest Alejandria wrote:
[snip]
Tarzan who is usually at his best behavior during these solemn
events must have been so taken by the romantic atmosphere of the moment
(notwithstanding the groom crying) that he decided to pick this time to
mount Jane(I'm trying to phrase this as
Cropped to protect the scandalous:
http://bigdayphoto.com/tom/images/boys.jpg
tv
"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
Oh, and at the same wedding, the girl who caught the bouquet
was wearing
a short dress and no panties...I have a funny shot of some 10 year old
boys getting an eyeful. Maybe I'll
Oh, and at the same wedding, the girl who caught the bouquet was wearing
a short dress and no panties...I have a funny shot of some 10 year old
boys getting an eyeful. Maybe I'll scan that one tonight.
tv
Never mind the boys, how about a shot of the girl sans panties.
Paulo Ernest
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wedding Hell (Redux)
Cropped to protect the scandalous:
http://bigdayphoto.com/tom/images/boys.jpg
tv
"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
Oh, and at the same wedding, the girl who caught
the bouquet
was wearing
a short dress and no panties...I have a f
Len Paris wrote:
You wouldn't think ten-year-olds could be that lascivious. :-)
You've got to be kidding...what agony it was being 10...
You can definitely tell that they had a better angle of view
than the camera!
I had the same angle (I innocently walked that way), but figured a
pz-1p,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wedding Hell (Redux)
Len Paris wrote:
You wouldn't think ten-year-olds could be that
lascivious. :-)
You've got
Tom writes:
You can definitely tell that they had a better angle of view
than the camera!
I had the same angle (I innocently walked that way), but figured a
pz-1p, 28-70/2.8 and af500ftz on a bracket wasn't sneaky
enoughprobably would have given her a sunburn.
This is the reason
7 matches
Mail list logo
