Re: So what's wrong with this picture...

The reviews are amusing. This guy was one of the 5-star reviewers, but I have to wonder if he's actually using it on a camera: "Works very well. My wife loves it!" On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:48 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: > I've been looking for a replacement lens hood for my FA 20-35mm, after a > num

Re: So what's wrong with this picture...

:90 degrees or 1/4 of a circle :-) Not all pack shooters are actually photographers! Jens Den 05-01-2015 kl. 04:48 skrev P.J. Alling: I've been looking for a replacement lens hood for my FA 20-35mm, after a number of years of service it cracked and part of it fell off, never to be seen again.

Re: So what's wrong with this picture...

On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:48 pm, P.J. Alling wrote: > I've been looking for a replacement lens hood for my FA 20-35mm, after a > number of years of service it cracked and part of it fell off, never to be > seen again. In my search I found this. > >

Re: So what's wrong with this picture...

Quoting "P.J. Alling" : I've been looking for a replacement lens hood for my FA 20-35mm, after a number of years of service it cracked and part of it fell off, never to be seen again. In my search I found this.

Re: So what's wrong with this picture...

$4.30 is a bit steep even with free shipping. J - Original Message - From: "P.J. Alling" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2015 7:48:05 PM Subject: So what's wrong with this picture... I've been looking for a replacement lens h

So what's wrong with this picture...

I've been looking for a replacement lens hood for my FA 20-35mm, after a number of years of service it cracked and part of it fell off, never to be seen again. In my search I found this.

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

No, the second link wasn't posted yet when I replied to your original message. The appearance of the strip is =not= consistent with Xray machine damage. I am referring to the kind of machine they warn WILL harm your film--the kind that examines checked baggage, not carry-on. Rick --- Toralf Lun

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Toralf , Including the sun in the frame is normally a minor problem, when the exposure is otherwise correct. But in the case if this frame, the overexposure may be in the realm of ten or twenty stops or even more. At normal exposures, or just a little more, internal reflections in the emulsion a

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Yes, red or yellow :-) Such as the sun? Of course, including the sun is "dangerous", but I also think it can be interesting... And this was a case of the sun being visible through the clouds, rather than shining from a clear sky, I believe... But I think I used a filter. That's wh

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

3. It is definitely possible that I messed up somehow on frame 18 - that's why frame 19 has essentially the same shot. I'll bet it was gross over-exposure. I'm trying very hard to remember what exactly I did, but I', not sure if I can. I must be getting old... I'm thinking I

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Comments interspersed: > -Original Message- > From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (snip) > > OK I really don't think that was the cause, the light appears to have come in > through the light box. > Definitely. You can see how the fog bleeds outwards from frame 18, yet the edg

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

On 29 Oct 2005 at 18:43, Toralf Lund wrote: > So, you think the actual pattern suggests that this happened while the > film was in the camera? Would the fact that frame 15 has a similar, but > narrower, band also be consistent with that. Definitely, if there is a band on frame 15 too that confi

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

It's a light leak. Was it the first or last frame on the roll? If so it may have been a loading error with the lab. If not, it may be that your sponge light seal on your film inspection window may be getting a bit old/worn. Those would be my 2 best guesses Butch

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

AM > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Toralf Lund" > Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? > > > > > >> > > So, you think the actual p

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

t; "Expert Proof" --- Toralf Lund wrote: William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: "Toralf Lund" Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? In any case, I've now also done a quick scan of the entire negative strip. Not a very good one

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: "Toralf Lund" Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? So, you think the actual pattern suggests that this happened while the film was in the camera? Would the fact that frame 15 has a similar, but narrower, band also be consi

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

You mean, of the kind that they tell you is harmless to film? No X-rays are harmess to film, not according to Kodak documentation anyway. Probably not. The point was that I suspect the people in charge of controls at airports don't have exactly the same opinion on what is harmful to

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

On 29 Oct 2005 at 15:17, Toralf Lund wrote: > You mean, of the kind that they tell you is harmless to film? No X-rays are harmess to film, not according to Kodak documentation anyway. > Did you look at > > http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bilde.php?navn=neg I didn't really have a clue what th

RE: What's wrong with this picture?

Emne: What's wrong with this picture? Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong here: http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bilde.php?navn=error ? I mean, where did the horizontal red band come from? This is a scan from film, and the band is clearly visible on the negative as well (as

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Rick Womer wrote: Was this roll of film in checked luggage on an airplane? Not while it was in my possession, no. But I'm quite sure the film wasn't manufactured anywhere near the place I bought it, if you know what I mean. And in this case I also used a shop that will send off the film to

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: "Toralf Lund" Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? In any case, I've now also done a quick scan of the entire negative strip. Not a very good one as I used a plain A4 document scanner, but I thin

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

It looks light struck to me. I'd say either in the can or the lab screwed up in processing. Toralf Lund wrote: Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong here: http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bilde.php?navn=error ? I mean, where did the horizontal red band come from? This is a scan

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Was this roll of film in checked luggage on an airplane? It looks like the work of one of the high-dose Xray machines that scans checked luggage. Rick --- Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong > here: > > http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bild

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Looks to me like the following shot was so over exposed that light went through the film, bounced around, and effected that frame on the take-up reel. Powell >In any case, I've now also done a quick scan of the entire negative >strip. Not a very good one as I used a plain A4 document scanner, b

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: "Toralf Lund" Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? In any case, I've now also done a quick scan of the entire negative strip. Not a very good one as I used a plain A4 document scanner, but I think it illustrates the problem

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: "Toralf Lund" Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? The band visble on the picture shown goes from top to bottom in the middle of a frame, Check the foam seal around the DX window (if your camera has one).

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: "Toralf Lund" Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? The band visble on the picture shown goes from top to bottom in the middle of a frame, Check the foam seal around the DX window (if your camera has one). I've seen the

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Charles Robinson wrote: On Oct 28, 2005, at 4:26, David Savage wrote: Looks like there may have been a light leak that fogged the film to me. My first impression, as well, is that the film was somehow exposed to light - perhaps at some point in the development stage. If you look at

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: "Toralf Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax Discuss" Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 5:06 AM Subject: What's wrong with this picture? Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong here: http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

On Oct 28, 2005, at 4:26, David Savage wrote: Looks like there may have been a light leak that fogged the film to me. But I really don't know. Dave On 10/28/05, Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong here: http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/

Re: What's wrong with this picture?

Looks like there may have been a light leak that fogged the film to me. But I really don't know. Dave On 10/28/05, Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong here: > > http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bilde.php?navn=error > > ? > > I mean, where did

What's wrong with this picture?

Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong here: http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bilde.php?navn=error ? I mean, where did the horizontal red band come from? This is a scan from film, and the band is clearly visible on the negative as well (as green rather than red, obviously.) So what