thats his problem. if he sends you a message, then only you have the
decription key (im talking public key crypto here), unless you are
careless.
graywolf wrote:
Ain't no reason you can't encript it though. But can you trust the guy
on the other end not to let the decription key out.
graywo
Ain't no reason you can't encript it though. But can you trust the guy
on the other end not to let the decription key out.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Juan Buhler wrote:
On 11/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PRO
Could one of you gmail people please send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and explain to him how to set his account to
send Plain Text messages. I'm sensing a growing unease on his part
trying to figure it out.
thanks,
Doug
List Guy
You are probably right to be paranoid in using Gmail, but if you only
use it for Mailing Lists (which are going to be publicly accessible to
anyone and to be archived anyway) you should not fear Gmail spies.
Me too am paranoid and I don't use it for personal stuff.
As a MLs repository, OTOH, it's
LOL. It's just my term for annoying or malicious software written
by...er...well...sods :-)
Dave
On 11/5/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sodware?
>
> Perhaps that's what our HR department meant. My colleagues and I are going
> on a 'teambuilding' day next week, which will involve mud (and
On Nov 5, 2005, at 8:52 PM, Bob W wrote:
Perhaps that's what our HR department meant. My colleagues and I
are going
on a 'teambuilding' day next week, which will involve mud (and a
lot of
sods). We've been told to bring some sturdy 'footware'.
Steel capped?
Cotty might be able to get you
to blowing Billy's bugle, but Outlook is really a
superb piece of software once you start to explore and exploit it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 November 2005 02:27
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: What is G
t; From: David Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 November 2005 02:28
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: What is Gmail?
>
> They are there. I'm sure that some clever sodware designer
> can figure out a way to extract them.
Shel,
Gmail invitations were scarce when it first came out, but now
everybody should have plenty. I have 49 left myself.
So, you could just open an account to see how it feels. If you care
about my judgement, I believe the concerns people have are no more
than unfounded conspiracy theories. All e
They are there. I'm sure that some clever sodware designer can figure
out a way to extract them.
Dave
On 11/5/05, Tom Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The archive doesn't have the e-mail addresses.
>
>
> > I only use it for the PDML & considering that it is archived for
> > anyone to read, what
Hi Bob ...hanks for the info and the invite. I'll pass - Gmail looks to be
a web-based mail system and I'd much prefer not to go that route.
With Earthlink I can quickly sort by sender, subject, date/time and can
read the mail off line.
I'd be curious to see what an invitation is like - but if y
> > I'm way too paranoid to use it:
> >
> > http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
>
> reese,
>
> you're too paranoid to use tap water...
Oh, now you're after me too?
The archive doesn't have the e-mail addresses.
> I only use it for the PDML & considering that it is archived for
> anyone to read, what difference does it make? :-)
Shel,
Gmail, Yahoo, and others let you create an email address to send and
receive email from. Gmail is from Google and particularly attractive
because it is fast and has a very, very large storage space for your
use. It beats all my other email systems - AOL, Lotus Notes at the
office, Yahoo mai
Once again I have to suggest you all to use some of the
modern > 1Gbmail system (as gmail)
...I have to suggest...
Why?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
Subject: What is Gmail?
[Original Message]
From: danilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Once again I have to su
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm way too paranoid to use it:
>
> http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
>
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: danilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
Tom - so am I
annsan
I only use it for the PDML & considering that it is archived for
anyone to read, what difference does it make? :-)
Dave
On 11/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm way too paranoid to use it:
>
> http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
>
>
> > > [Original Message]
> > > Wrom:
On 11/4/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/4/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This might help. http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about.html
> >
> > When you're ready, Cotty might have some invites for you.
>
> are you being sarcastic?
>
>
>
Nope. Not me. Nev
On 11/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm way too paranoid to use it:
>
> http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
reese,
you're too paranoid to use tap water...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 11/4/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This might help. http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about.html
>
> When you're ready, Cotty might have some invites for you.
are you being sarcastic?
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Seems to be.
Malcolm Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
Is it safe to click on the link (very paranoid)?
Malcolm
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
A waste of netspace.
Godfrey
PGP
Juan Buhler wrote:
On 11/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm way too paranoid to use it:
http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
LOL
All these sites started back when Google said they scan words in
emails in order to target text ads to you. People reacted like it wa
On 11/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm way too paranoid to use it:
>
> http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
LOL
All these sites started back when Google said they scan words in
emails in order to target text ads to you. People reacted like it was
the end of the world.
T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm way too paranoid to use it:
http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
Beautiful!
I've been looking for my copy for some time, but misplaced it.
It's now bookmarked, thanks to your diligence!
keith whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
Is it safe to click on the link (very paranoid)?
Malcolm
I find google-mail's pretty useful for a chatty group such as PDML.
Keeps the conversational threads mostly straight. Plus remember, your
conversation has already been immortalised on google (via
mail-archive.com). Now's a bit late to be paranoid about it. But yes,
I wouldn't use gmail for anything
On 4/11/05, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>When you're ready, Cotty might have some invites for you.
I doubt it - I'm using them all up subscribing to the PDML.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 4/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
ROTFL
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I'm way too paranoid to use it:
http://www.google-watch.org/gmail.html
> > [Original Message]
> > From: danilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Once again I have to suggest you all to use some of the
> > modern > 1Gbmail system (as gmail) to subscribe to the ML.
>
> [...]
>
> > I have a lot of s
This might help. http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about.html
When you're ready, Cotty might have some invites for you.
On 11/4/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Original Message]
> > From: danilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Once again I have to suggest you all to use some of the
> [Original Message]
> From: danilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Once again I have to suggest you all to use some of the
> modern > 1Gbmail system (as gmail) to subscribe to the ML.
[...]
> I have a lot of spare invitation if you like
32 matches
Mail list logo
