Googled, cool.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 1/27/2014 7:42:01 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
p...@paper-ape.com writes:
on 2014-01-26 23:10 eactiv...@aol.com wrote
> Interesting. Never heard of that, at all.
see if your library has any books of Man Ray's work
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
on 2014-01-26 23:10 eactiv...@aol.com wrote
Interesting. Never heard of that, at all.
see if your library has any books of Man Ray's work
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Reality is living in one of the 48 states that dont have legalized
recreational marijuana.
On 1/27/2014 5:04 PM, John wrote:
Reality: It's a nice place to visit, but you wouldn't want to live there.
On 1/27/2014 4:28 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Go
Reality: It's a nice place to visit, but you wouldn't want to live there.
On 1/27/2014 4:28 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Go you one better -- What is reality?
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."
Lessee -- five mil
Philip K. Dick, a science fiction writer.
On Jan 27, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> Go you one better -- What is reality?
>
> "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."
>
> Lessee -- five million quatlo
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Go you one better -- What is reality?
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."
Lessee -- five million quatloos to the first person who identifies the
author.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Wasn't really about photography though. It was all about museums & curators.
On 1/26/2014 1:59 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I read it thoroughly. It was worth my while.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:38 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
I skimmed it, there may actually be a new thought in there, but it's not
wort
Interesting. Never heard of that, at all.
Marnie Still amused by exploding heads, subject photographs of said
event, and/or selfies of said event, which will be an actual objective event.
Or something like that. :-)
In a message dated 1/26/2014 3:18:57 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
webster
I think that putting leaves or other items on a sensitized material and
exposing to light, used to be called something like photogram. There
was a "scientific play" kit that came with plastic "negatives" a frame
to hold the paper and of course a light sensitive paper that turned sort
of purple
Yes I found that part intriguing. Hadn't thought about it, now I might try
it. (i.e. scanner image/collage).
Marnie aka Doe :-) It was an interesting article, Paul.
In a message dated 1/26/2014 1:27:16 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
pnstenqu...@comcast.net writes:
And according to some of the
On Jan 26, 2014, at 1:03 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
> Go you one better -- What is reality?
>
> My definition: a photograph is art and/or documentary or somewhere in
> between. (Thinking of the Photojournalism thread.)
>
And according to some of the art museum curators interviewed for th
We aim to please.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
In a message dated 1/26/2014 10:26:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
I think my head's going to explode.
cheers,
frank
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
>Go you one better -- What is reality?
>
>My definition: a photograph is ar
Meant to say it will be "subjective", too...
Cheers
frank
Stanley Halpin wrote:
>
>On Jan 26, 2014, at 1:26 PM, knarf wrote:
>
>> I think my head's going to explode.
>>
>> cheers,
>> frank
>>
>
>Hold on Frank - I’ll be right over to take a photo of that event… I
>suspect it will be a subject
I'll take a selfie of the event. That will be subject too.
But it will be a representation of a real event...
:-)
Cheers,
frank
Stanley Halpin wrote:
>
>On Jan 26, 2014, at 1:26 PM, knarf wrote:
>
>> I think my head's going to explode.
>>
>> cheers,
>> frank
>>
>
>Hold on Frank - I’ll be ri
On Jan 26, 2014, at 1:26 PM, knarf wrote:
> I think my head's going to explode.
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
Hold on Frank - I’ll be right over to take a photo of that event… I suspect it
will be a subjective interpretation.
stan
> eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
>> Go you one better -- What is reality?
I read it thoroughly. It was worth my while.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:38 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> I skimmed it, there may actually be a new thought in there, but it's not
> worth my while to find out.
>
>
> On 1/26/2014 11:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> An article in today’s Times that’s rel
I skimmed it, there may actually be a new thought in there, but it's not
worth my while to find out.
On 1/26/2014 11:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
An article in today’s Times that’s relevant to recent discussions:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/arts/design/with-cameras-optional-new-direction
I think my head's going to explode.
cheers,
frank
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
>Go you one better -- What is reality?
>
>My definition: a photograph is art and/or documentary or somewhere in
>
>between. (Thinking of the Photojournalism thread.)
>
>Physical objects are easy. A chair is a chair. A
Go you one better -- What is reality?
My definition: a photograph is art and/or documentary or somewhere in
between. (Thinking of the Photojournalism thread.)
Physical objects are easy. A chair is a chair. A photo of a chair is a
photo of a chair.
But what is a war/a protest march/an airp
On 1/26/2014 11:34 AM, Bob W wrote:
On 26 Jan 2014, at 16:26, "J.C. O'Connell" wrote:
Same goes for "what is a movie"?
That one's easy. It's a sequence of photographs replayed at 14fps.
On the other hand, you could, like André Bazin, ask what is cinema? Or you
could go further, as the Frenc
On 26 Jan 2014, at 16:34, Bob W wrote:
>
>> On 26 Jan 2014, at 16:26, "J.C. O'Connell" wrote:
>>
>> Same goes for "what is a movie"?
>
> That one's easy. It's a sequence of photographs replayed at 14fps
Ahem, 24fps. Slo-mo is frowned upon.
B
> On the other hand, you could, like André Bazin,
On 26 Jan 2014, at 16:40, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Bob W wrote:
>
>>> On 26 Jan 2014, at 16:26, "J.C. O'Connell" wrote:
>>>
>>> Same goes for "what is a movie"?
>>
>> That one's easy. It's a sequence of photographs replayed at 14fps.
>>
>> On the other hand, you could, like André Bazin, ask w
Bob W wrote:
>On 26 Jan 2014, at 16:26, "J.C. O'Connell" wrote:
>>
>> Same goes for "what is a movie"?
>>
>
>That one's easy. It's a sequence of photographs replayed at 14fps.
>
>On the other hand, you could, like André Bazin, ask what is cinema?
>Or you could go further, as the French cineast
On 26 Jan 2014, at 16:26, "J.C. O'Connell" wrote:
>
> Same goes for "what is a movie"?
>
That one's easy. It's a sequence of photographs replayed at 14fps.
On the other hand, you could, like André Bazin, ask what is cinema? Or you
could go further, as the French cineastes do, and ask what is
Same goes for "what is a movie"?
--
J.C. O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
--
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
An article in today’s Times that’s relevant to recent discussions:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/arts/design/with-cameras-optional-new-directions-in-photography.html?_r=0
“The iPhone, the scanner and Photoshop are yielding a daunting range of
imagery, and artists mining these new technologie
26 matches
Mail list logo
