Your opinion on these lenses

Hi; I think I've made up my mind on what to look for. I'm thinking of a 28 3.5 smcp, 135 3.5 smcp, and a 200 4.0 smcp, all either K's or M's. Anyone who has had any of those lenses, your feedback would be appreciated. Also, how similar is the 200 4.0 M to the older 200 4 screwmount super takumar

Re: Your opinion on these lenses

Hi Butch, I have the M 135/3.5. It's a very nice, compact, high quality, and super affordable lens. Good tonality, haven't had a problem with flare (the built-in hood doesn't look big enough to me, but it seems to do the job all the same). If I replaced mine, it would probably be with something t

Re: Your opinion on these lenses

Use the hood for the Takumar 135/3.5 ... it's deeper and affords more protection. They can be found inexpensively on eBay and at camera fairs and shops that sell used gear. Dan Scott wrote: > > Hi Butch, > > I have the M 135/3.5 [...] (the > built-in hood doesn't look big > enough to me, but