Zeiss and Pentax coatings, lenses (similarities, differences)

2002-04-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out http://www.cdegroot.com/archives/yashicacontax-slr/199905/msg00087.html for a summary of the collaboration between Pentax and Zeiss by someone paraphrasing a book by an Asahi historian. It provides some details about how the coatings and two or three lenses began as joint

Re: Zeiss and Pentax coatings, lenses (similarities, differences)

2002-04-23 Thread Alan Chan
Interestingly, the article also mentions the 18mm lens as to result from the joint development of Pentax and Zeiss. I have never found a confirmation information about that anywhere. However, I have a diagram of the Contax Distagon 18/4. This shows that it's design is exactly identical to that

Re: Zeiss and Pentax coatings, lenses (similarities, differences)

2002-04-23 Thread Fred
I could be mistaken, but as I can see, Pentax do not seem to use floating element design like the other manufacturers. I know Nikon use it. Any idea? I think that one of the Pentax lenses that may supposedly have involved some Zeiss/Pentax collaboration is the the K 28/2, which uses a

Re: Zeiss and Pentax coatings, lenses (similarities, differences)

2002-04-23 Thread Frantisek Vlcek
F Actually, though, it is not clear in my mind, but wouldn't IF F lenses be, in effect, lenses that have floating elements (inasmuch F as one or more elements move relative to the other elements when F focusing)? Or, to put it another way, couldn't the term be applied F to any lens that moves

Re: Zeiss and Pentax coatings, lenses (similarities, differences)

2002-04-23 Thread b_rubenstein
If you over generalize, then yes, IF = floating element. In the case of Nikon, they refer to a floating element design, for wide angles, as Close-Range Correction (CRC). It's intended to improve performance of the lens when focused close. Aside from the single CRC element the lens focuses