Mark wrote:
Bit of a "straw man" argument there, since the A 3.5 f2.8 has been singled out by
several users (you in particular) as a dog.
REPLY:
Not really. I was trying to illustrate my opinion that todays good zoom are equally
good or better than yesterdays primes. The A 35/2.8 is fairly typ
Frank wrote:
Even if we take Pal's original statement as true ("today's best zooms are every
bit as good as primes"), a zoom is going to exact some penalty on it's user.
REPLY:
I didn't actually say that. That was something I quoted.
Pål
Thank you Joseph. Your tests cured my zoom-phobia. I
have always thought that the since 28-105 PZ has an
excellent reputation as a very sharp lens but it
still wasn't sharp enough when compared to any of my
primes, I have to stick with prime lenses only.
Turns out I was very wrong indeed.
REPLY:
3 matches
Mail list logo
