On 1/2/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/01/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I checked with Lifepixels about converting one of my istD's, but they
> > don't refit and Pentax for some reason.
>
> Yes I noticed, however if given the filter dimensions I'm s
> If I do do it I will record the process and make it available to others
> :-)
Hmm interesting idea, I might give it a go also down the track.
Hey, how about coming up with a way to seperate the colour filter array from
the sensor? That'd be nice :)
- Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On 02/01/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I checked with Lifepixels about converting one of my istD's, but they
> don't refit and Pentax for some reason.
Yes I noticed, however if given the filter dimensions I'm sure that
they would cut to size for a price.
> I'm sure you and many
Quoting Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks Rob, that makes sense. It's much more clear than "aha?" :-))
>> Perhaps my D will become my IR camera. I think I'll try the same shot
>> with both bodies and see what I get.
>
> I'v
On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Rob, that makes sense. It's much more clear than "aha?" :-))
> Perhaps my D will become my IR camera. I think I'll try the same shot
> with both bodies and see what I get.
I've been toying with the thought of converting my *ist D to a
Thanks Rob, that makes sense. It's much more clear than "aha?" :-))
Perhaps my D will become my IR camera. I think I'll try the same shot
with both bodies and see what I get.
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think any of this proves a thing.
It was discussed on dpreview in the first few days the camera was
actually in users hands, frankly I as inferred I hope its IR
sensitivity sucks. I've had too many IR induced colour problems due to
t
Aha.
On Dec 31, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
> Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think any of this proves a thing.
>
> Aha?
>
> --
> Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
> private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
> manual cameras and photo
Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think any of this proves a thing.
Aha?
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount
I don't think any of this proves a thing.
On Dec 31, 2006, at 2:54 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
> George Sinos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I just red this post on the photo.net pentax forum on IR shots with
>> the K10D. The fellow used a hoya R72 and long exposure times. He
>> posted three
<http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00JKfj&tag=>
>
> If not, the message is on the Photo.net Pentax Forum titled "K10D
> Infrared Shots"
>
> See you later, gs
> <http://georgesphotos.net>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> P
George Sinos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just red this post on the photo.net pentax forum on IR shots with
> the K10D. The fellow used a hoya R72 and long exposure times. He
> posted three examples shot with the 16-45 that look good.
If anything it proves that IR with the K10D sure isn't the
JKfj&tag=>
If not, the message is on the Photo.net Pentax Forum titled "K10D
Infrared Shots"
See you later, gs
<http://georgesphotos.net>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
13 matches
Mail list logo
