That's on the *istD. I suspect it would cause some vignetting on a full
frame camera.
Paul
On Nov 14, 2005, at 2:52 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 7:19 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
An FYI: I tried the Takumar 135/3.5 lens hood on the FA 50/1.4. I see
no vignetting in shots of a white
On Nov 14, 2005, at 7:19 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
An FYI: I tried the Takumar 135/3.5 lens hood on the FA 50/1.4. I
see no vignetting in shots of a white wall. It's a nice metal hood
for this lens.
Digital or film?
I use a square 50mm hood on my 35mm f/3.5 without any problems.
Looks g
Hi Paul,
I've used that same hood on my 50mm lenses with the digi. Seems to work
well, although I've net checked it with a pol filter. However, for the most
part, I use the 105/2.8 Takumar hood. It's a little smaller and more
convenient to use and carry.
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a
An FYI: I tried the Takumar 135/3.5 lens hood on the FA 50/1.4. I
see no vignetting in shots of a white wall. It's a nice metal hood
for this lens.
That should be a good, tight hood for a 50! :-)
I use the Kalt (generic) 49mm metal hood. Not quite as much
protection, but smaller and handi
On Nov 13, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
An FYI: I tried the Takumar 135/3.5 lens hood on the FA 50/1.4. I
see no vignetting in shots of a white wall. It's a nice metal hood
for this lens.
That should be a good, tight hood for a 50! :-)
I use the Kalt (generic) 49mm metal hood. N
An FYI: I tried the Takumar 135/3.5 lens hood on the FA 50/1.4. I see
no vignetting in shots of a white wall. It's a nice metal hood for this
lens.
6 matches
Mail list logo
