The finish line is where the Pixel density is about the same as that on
the K-5. To get more quality Pixels the sensor size will have to
increase, which will be very expensive, and those cameras are pretty
expensive already.
It's interesting that the Hassy X1d is approximately $8.7K US which
It's the same sensor as the 645z, and several Phase One's.
If there's a megapixel race in MF, having used one extensively to
shoot and retouch people, I'd suggest that 50 mpix could be considered
the finish line.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>
> Probably the same sensor
There's a headline (footline?) at the bottom of the article that says:
"The $27,000 monster of a camera from Hasselblad"
I think it's referring to Hasselblad's H6D.
It might actually be a link of some kind, but I don't feel like going
through all the javascripts NoScript blocked looking for the
In case anyone else is interested, Camera Size already has the Hassy in
their data base, the 645z not so much, but here's a comparison to the
645D just for giggles.
http://camerasize.com/compare/#678,211
On 6/22/2016 10:15 AM, Gonz wrote:
http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/6/22/1198
I just reread the page, I don't know where I got 27 grand from it's only
8 grand, clearly affordable.
On 6/22/2016 11:39 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
27 grand for the body plus new lenses, I can see the current owners of
Hassleblad rubbing their hands and dreaming of sugarplums. I wonder
how many t
27 grand for the body plus new lenses, I can see the current owners of
Hassleblad rubbing their hands and dreaming of sugarplums. I wonder how
many they'll actually sell at that price.
On 6/22/2016 10:15 AM, Gonz wrote:
http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/6/22/11988986/hasselblad-x1d-
For once Hasselblad is innovating instead of sticking wood on Sony bodies,
so that is something. The flange to sensor difference means a whole new
line of AF lenses (as the article states) or an adapter (currently for the
Hassy 12H lenses only). So this body may appeal of Hassy owners of those
lens
Yes, let me add a label.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Might this be OT ?
>
>
> -Original Message-
>>From: Gonz
>>Subject: mirrorless Hassy
>>
>>http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/6/22/11988986/hasselblad-x1d-m
Might this be OT ?
-Original Message-
>From: Gonz
>Subject: mirrorless Hassy
>
>http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/6/22/11988986/hasselblad-x1d-mirrorless-medium-format-camera-specs
>
>--
>-- Reduce your Government
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/6/22/11988986/hasselblad-x1d-mirrorless-medium-format-camera-specs
--
-- Reduce your Government Footprint
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
10 matches
Mail list logo
