>From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hi Timo,
>
>I don't pretend to know a thing about shooting with models,
"Calibre" is the most important concern.
Oh, wait, that's "with" models.
Perhaps "gague" is better.
What are you shooting with them?
>but it certainly looks like this
I did some changes.. (as Bob S. wished)
added 2 pics & removed "the least attractive"-pic.
-Timo
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Well that's not fair. Now we'll never know if the cell phone pic was
really that unattractive.
Seriously these were very nice. (The last set were very nice as well). I
thought
the fourth from the right was an especially good composition.
At 08:15 PM 8/18/2001 +0300, you wrote:
>I did some c
At 10:20 18.8.2001 +0300, you wrote:
>Some pics from my 2nd "photo session" with a model.
>
>http://pp.hok.fi/hartikainen/tiia.htm
Simply fantastic!
She looks like having a natural gift for being photographed :-)
Makes me think I need to try to shoot some portraiture in the future.
Antti-Pekka
Peter A. wrote:
>Well that's not fair. Now we'll never know if the cell phone pic was
>really that unattractive.
I just noticed it's still there, but it's not linked to the page:
http://pp.hok.fi/hartikainen/tiia_e.jpg
-th
_
Antti-Pekka Virjonen writes:
> Makes me think I need to try to shoot some portraiture in the future.
I think the right model would be enough to convert even the most die-hard
landscaper into doing portraits... outdoor portraits, of course :)
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec)
http:/
At 18:57 20.8.2001 +1200, Dave wrote:
>Antti-Pekka Virjonen writes:
>
>> Makes me think I need to try to shoot some portraiture in the future.
>
> I think the right model would be enough to convert even the most die-hard
>landscaper into doing portraits... outdoor portraits, of course :)
Absolut
Well you probably won't be able to sell that one to a cell phone company
for an advertisement
but it's not bad.
At 09:25 AM 8/20/2001 +0300, Timo wrote:
>Peter A. wrote:
>>Well that's not fair. Now we'll never know if the cell phone pic was
>>really that unattractive.
>
>I just noticed it's st
Nice pics, and the model is very cute. What equipment did you used?
As I've said in a previous post, the pics of the baby (your son?) are very
very good, and very sharp where they must be. Did you scanned the negs or
just prints?
Regards
Albano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
Albano asked:
>What equipment did you used?
Ricoh XR-X with Pentax A 100/4 mostly, for the model pics.
>As I've said in a previous post, the pics of the baby (your son?) are >very
>good, and very sharp where they must be. Did you scanned the negs >or just
>prints?
(yes it's my son.. 9 months
10 matches
Mail list logo
